B-type natriuretic peptide, disease progression and clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation

ObjectiveThe association with B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), disease progression and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been thoroughly investigated.MethodsWe evaluated the association between BNP levels and outcomes, including AF progression, composite outcome of major ad...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2019-03, Vol.105 (5), p.370-377
Hauptverfasser: Inohara, Taku, Kim, Sunghee, Pieper, Karen, Blanco, Rosalia G, Allen, Larry A, Fonarow, Gregg C, Gersh, Bernard J, Ezekowitz, Michael D, Kowey, Peter R, Reiffel, James A, Naccarelli, Gerald V, Chan, Paul S, Mahaffey, Kenneth W, Singer, Daniel E, Freeman, James V, Steinberg, Benjamin A, Peterson, Eric D, Piccini, Jonathan P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ObjectiveThe association with B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), disease progression and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been thoroughly investigated.MethodsWe evaluated the association between BNP levels and outcomes, including AF progression, composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular or neurological events (MACNE) and major bleeding, via pooled logistic regression and Cox frailty models in Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II registry. AF progression was defined as either paroxysmal becoming persistent or permanent, or persistent becoming permanent at any follow-up.ResultsAmong 13 375 patients with AF, 2797 with BNP values at baseline (median age (IQR), 72.0 (63.0–80.0) years; 43.0% women; median BNP, 238 (102–502) ng/L; 42.3% prior heart failure) were included in the models evaluating the association between BNP levels and MACNE or major bleeding. Of these, 1282 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF at baseline were analysed in AF progression model. The likelihood of AF progression (adjusted OR, 1.11 for every 100 ng/mL; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.19) and MACNE (adjusted HR, 1.11 for every doubling in BNP values; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.22) increased with BNP concentration, while the elevated BNP values were not associated with increased risks of major bleeding. BNP values improved the risk prediction of AF progression and MACNE when added to conventional risk estimates.ConclusionsBNP levels are associated with increased risk of AF progression and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with AF. Further studies are required to assess whether biomarker-based risk stratification improves patient outcomes.Clinical trial registrationNCT01701817.
ISSN:1355-6037
1468-201X
DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313642