Brentuximab Vedotin plus Chemotherapy in North American Subjects with Newly Diagnosed Stage III or IV Hodgkin Lymphoma

To evaluate safety and efficacy outcomes for subjects on the ECHELON-1 study treated in North America (NA). ECHELON-1 is a global, open-label, randomized phase III study comparing doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine in combination with brentuximab vedotin (A+AVD) versus ABVD (AVD + bleomycin)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical cancer research 2019-03, Vol.25 (6), p.1718-1726
Hauptverfasser: Ramchandren, Radhakrishnan, Advani, Ranjana H, Ansell, Stephen M, Bartlett, Nancy L, Chen, Robert, Connors, Joseph M, Feldman, Tatyana, Forero-Torres, Andres, Friedberg, Jonathan W, Gopal, Ajay K, Gordon, Leo I, Kuruvilla, John, Savage, Kerry J, Younes, Anas, Engley, Gerald, Manley, Thomas J, Fenton, Keenan, Straus, David J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate safety and efficacy outcomes for subjects on the ECHELON-1 study treated in North America (NA). ECHELON-1 is a global, open-label, randomized phase III study comparing doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine in combination with brentuximab vedotin (A+AVD) versus ABVD (AVD + bleomycin) as first-line therapy in subjects with stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL; NCT01712490). Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive A+AVD or ABVD intravenously on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to 6 cycles. The NA subgroup consisted of 497 subjects in the A+AVD ( = 250) and ABVD ( = 247) arms. Similar to the primary analysis based on the intent-to-treat population, the primary endpoint [modified progression-free survival (PFS) per independent review] demonstrated an improvement among subjects who received A+AVD compared with ABVD (HR = 0.60; = 0.012). For PFS, the risk of progression or death was also reduced (HR = 0.50; = 0.002). Subsequent anticancer therapies were lower in the A+AVD arm. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) were more common, but there were fewer study discontinuations due to AEs in the A+AVD arm as compared with ABVD. Noted differences between arms included higher rates of febrile neutropenia (20% vs. 9%) and peripheral neuropathy (80% vs. 56%), but lower rates of pulmonary toxicity (3% vs. 10%) in subjects treated with A+AVD versus ABVD. The efficacy benefit and manageable toxicity profile observed in the NA subgroup of ECHELON-1 support A+AVD as a frontline treatment option for patients with stage III or IV cHL.
ISSN:1078-0432
1557-3265
DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2435