Helminth infections of wild European gray wolves (Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758) in Lower Saxony, Germany, and comparison to captive wolves
This study aimed to investigate the endoparasite fauna of wild European gray wolves, which are currently recolonizing Germany. In total, 69 fecal samples of wild wolves were collected in Lower Saxony, Germany, from 2013 to 2015, analyzed by the sedimentation-flotation and McMaster techniques and com...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Parasitology research (1987) 2019-02, Vol.118 (2), p.701-706 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This study aimed to investigate the endoparasite fauna of wild European gray wolves, which are currently recolonizing Germany. In total, 69 fecal samples of wild wolves were collected in Lower Saxony, Germany, from 2013 to 2015, analyzed by the sedimentation-flotation and McMaster techniques and compared to previous results on captive European Gray wolves living in zoological gardens in Germany. In addition to coproscopy, taeniid-positive samples from wild as well as captive wolves were differentiated by amplification and sequencing of small subunit ribosomal RNA (
SSU rRNA
) and NADH dehydrogenase 1 (
nad1
) gene fragments. Missing
Taenia krabbei SSU rRNA
reference sequences were generated from two
T. krabbei
specimens. Overall, 60.87% (42/69) of wild wolve samples were microscopically positive for at least one of seven egg types.
Capillaria
/
Eucoleus
spp. showed the highest frequency (31.88% [22/69]), followed by Taeniidae (21.74% [15/69]), Ancylostomatidae (20.29% [14/69]),
Alaria alata
(15.94% [11/69]),
Toxocara canis
(13.04% [9/69]), and
Toxascaris leonina
and
Trichuris vulpis
(each 5.80% [4/69]). Amplification of
SSU rRNA
was successful for 7/15 Taeniidae-positive samples from wild and 20/39 samples from captive wolves, revealing
T. hydatigena
in two and 14 samples, respectively.
Taenia krabbei
was detected in two further samples of wild and three samples of captive wolves, while for the remaining samples, no differentiation between
T. serialis
/
T. krabbei
was possible.
Echinococcus
spp. were not detected. Sequence comparisons revealed that the
SSU rRNA
gene fragment was not suitable to differentiate between
T. serialis
and
T. krabbei
. Therefore, the use of this fragment alone cannot be recommended for species identification in future studies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0932-0113 1432-1955 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00436-018-6181-3 |