Expert reading coaching via technology: Investigating the reading, writing, and spelling outcomes of students in grades K–8 experiencing significant reading learning disabilities

While qualitative research has shown great benefits for teachers who receive coaching, there is a paucity of experimental research examining students’academic outcomes after their teachers received ongoing support from a knowledgeable and experienced coach. Thus, a quasiexperimental design investiga...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of dyslexia 2019-04, Vol.69 (1), p.54-79
Hauptverfasser: Weiser, Beverly, Buss, Carolyn, Sheils, Ashley Parker, Gallegos, Elisa, Murray, L. Robin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:While qualitative research has shown great benefits for teachers who receive coaching, there is a paucity of experimental research examining students’academic outcomes after their teachers received ongoing support from a knowledgeable and experienced coach. Thus, a quasiexperimental design investigated the literacy outcomes of 452 students experiencing reading learning disabilities in grades K–8th whose special education and/or resource room teachers (n = 44) received student data-focused coaching support through on-site coaching, on-demand coaching (teachers could request support if needed), or through technology-based coaching. Specifically, researchers wanted to investigate if technology-based coaching was as effective as in-classroom support for increasing teachers’knowledge and implementation of researchbased reading instructional routines and ultimately, improving the reading, writing, and spelling outcomes of students with reading learning disabilities. Results yielded positive student academic growth for all three methods of coaching; however, coaching via technology, a more efficient, less time-consuming method of giving teachers ongoing professional development, produced larger statistically significant Cohen’s d effect sizes than the other two forms of coaching ranging from 0.22 to 1.01 in areas of phonemic awareness, decoding, comprehension, fluency, writing, and spelling. Other findings as well as the educational implications of implementing coaching via technology are also included.
ISSN:0736-9387
1934-7243
DOI:10.1007/s11881-018-00175-1