Middle‐ear dexamethasone delivery via ultrasound microbubbles attenuates noise‐induced hearing loss

Objectives/Hypothesis In this study, we expanded our previous investigation by testing the efficiency of trans–round window membrane dexamethasone (DEX) delivery mediated by ultrasound (US)‐aided microbubbles (MBs) and its preventive effects regarding noise exposure in animal models. Study Design Li...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2019-08, Vol.129 (8), p.1907-1914
Hauptverfasser: Shih, Cheng‐Ping, Chen, Hsin‐Chien, Lin, Yi‐Chun, Chen, Hang‐Kang, Wang, Hao, Kuo, Chao‐Yin, Lin, Yuan‐Yung, Wang, Chih‐Hung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives/Hypothesis In this study, we expanded our previous investigation by testing the efficiency of trans–round window membrane dexamethasone (DEX) delivery mediated by ultrasound (US)‐aided microbubbles (MBs) and its preventive effects regarding noise exposure in animal models. Study Design Live animal model. Methods Forty‐two pigmented male guinea pigs were divided into the following three groups: an US‐MBs (USM) group, in which the tympanic bulla was filled with DEX and MBs and exposed to US; a round window soaking (RWS) group, without the US irradiation; and a control group. The above‐mentioned manipulations were performed 2 hours prior to white noise exposure. The cochlear damage, including auditory threshold shifts, hair cell loss, and expression of cochlear HMGB1, was evaluated. Results The enhanced DEX delivery efficiency of the USM group was approximately 2.4× to 11.2× greater than that of the RWS group. After the noise exposure, the RWS group showed significant cochlear protection compared with the control group, and more significant and dominant protective effects were demonstrated in the USM group. Conclusions The application of US‐MBs provides a safe and more effective approach than spontaneous diffusion, which is commonly used in clinical practice; thus, this technique holds potential for future inner‐ear drug delivery. Level of Evidence NALaryngoscope, 129:1907–1914, 2019
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.27713