Impact of subjective vs. objective remission status on subjective cognitive impairments in depression

•Objective/subjective depression severity affects subjective cognitive impairment.•Subjective remission seems more correlated with subjective cognitive function.•Objective remission alone does not represent favorable cognitive function. The impact of subjective vs. objective illness severity on subj...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of affective disorders 2019-03, Vol.246, p.99-104
Hauptverfasser: Sawada, Kyosuke, Yoshida, Kazunari, Ozawa, Chisa, Mizuno, Yuya, Rubinstein, Ellen B., Suzuki, Takefumi, Mimura, Masaru, Uchida, Hiroyuki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Objective/subjective depression severity affects subjective cognitive impairment.•Subjective remission seems more correlated with subjective cognitive function.•Objective remission alone does not represent favorable cognitive function. The impact of subjective vs. objective illness severity on subjective cognitive impairment in patients with depression has not been addressed. This study is a post-hoc analysis of our cross-sectional study in Japanese outpatients with depressive disorder (ICD-10) (Ozawa et al., 2017). The participants received assessments with the Japanese version of the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (J-PDQ), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), and Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). First, multiple regression analysis was conducted to examine the effects of demographic and clinical characteristics, including illness severity and medications (e.g., antidepressants and benzodiazepines), on the PDQ total score. Next, we categorized the participants into 4 groups based on the presence/absence of subjective and objective symptom remission (i.e., QIDS total score of ≤5 and MADRS total score of ≤9, respectively), and compared the differences in PDQ total scores between the QIDS- and MADRS-remitted group and the QIDS-non-remitted but MADRS-remitted group. 102 participants were included (45 men; mean ± SD age, 50.5 ± 14.7 years). Higher QIDS and MADRS total scores were significantly associated with a greater PDQ total score (both p’s 
ISSN:0165-0327
1573-2517
DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.049