Withdrawal of the Decision to Donate Kidney by Living Related Donors: A Single-center Study in Japan

In Japan, 90% of kidney transplantations involve living related donors. A third-party interview is conducted during latter stages of preparation for transplantation to ensure the donor's voluntary decision-making. In this study, we investigated the factors responsible for withdrawal of decision...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation proceedings 2018-12, Vol.50 (10), p.3045-3052
Hauptverfasser: Noda, T., Kobayashi, S., Sawamura, J., Oshibuchi, H., Nishimura, K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In Japan, 90% of kidney transplantations involve living related donors. A third-party interview is conducted during latter stages of preparation for transplantation to ensure the donor's voluntary decision-making. In this study, we investigated the factors responsible for withdrawal of decision for kidney donation by related living donors after third-party interview. Related living donor candidates were divided into 2 groups based on their final decision: those who finally donated the kidney (FDG; n = 435); and those who withdrew their decision after third-party interview (WG; n = 11). The psychosocial and medical variables were compared and the reasons for withdrawal were investigated. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that none of the variables were significantly related to WG. Six categories of reasons for withdrawal were identified: “avoiding pregnancy risk”; “selecting alternative treatment”; “avoiding physical burden for donor”; “recipients' intemperance”; “need to take more time for decision-making”; and “psychological pressure.” A certain number of donor candidates withdrew their decision for different reasons, even in the latter stages of the transplant preparation. Careful verification of the donor candidates' individual situation and provision of adequate information and time are important to protect the donor's right to refuse.
ISSN:0041-1345
1873-2623
DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.06.031