A multicentered evaluation of ablation at higher power guided by ablation index: Establishing ablation targets for pulmonary vein isolation

Background Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using high power delivered by SmartTouch Surround Flow (STSF) catheters guided by ablation index (AI) was evaluated in a multicenter registry. Methods Patients with paroxysmal AF underwent PVI with STSF catheters using 30 W on the posterior wall and 40 W els...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2019-03, Vol.30 (3), p.357-365
Hauptverfasser: Dhillon, Gurpreet, Ahsan, Syed, Honarbakhsh, Shohreh, Lim, Wei, Baca, Marco, Graham, Adam, Srinivasan, Neil, Sawhney, Vinit, Sporton, Simon, Schilling, Richard J., Chow, Anthony, Ginks, Matthew, Sohal, Manav, Gallagher, Mark M., Hunter, Ross J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using high power delivered by SmartTouch Surround Flow (STSF) catheters guided by ablation index (AI) was evaluated in a multicenter registry. Methods Patients with paroxysmal AF underwent PVI with STSF catheters using 30 W on the posterior wall and 40 W elsewhere. AI targets were 350 posterior walls and 450 elsewhere. Procedures were compared with controls using conventionally irrigated contact force‐sensing catheters using conventional powers (25 W posterior wall and 30 W elsewhere) guided by force‐time integral (no agreed targets). The waiting period of 30 minutes was observed before adenosine administration to assess acute pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection. Results One hundred patients from four centers were included: 50 patients in the high power ablation index (HPAI) group and 50 controls. Procedure time was 22% shorter in the HPAI group (156 [133.8‐179] vs 199 [178.5‐227] minutes; P 
ISSN:1045-3873
1540-8167
DOI:10.1111/jce.13813