Hyperbaric storage at variable room temperature – a new preservation methodology for minced meat compared to refrigeration

Hyperbaric storage (HS) at variable room temperature (RT) has been proposed as an alternative to refrigeration at atmospheric pressure (RF/AP) for food preservation. Little information is available regarding the effect of HS in meat products. In this study the RT/HS effect was evaluated at 100 MPa a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the science of food and agriculture 2019-05, Vol.99 (7), p.3276-3282
Hauptverfasser: Fernandes, Pedro AR, Moreira, Sílvia A, Santos, Mauro D, Duarte, Ricardo V, Santos, Diana I, Inácio, Rita S, Alves, Susana P, Bessa, Rui JB, Delgadillo, Ivonne, Saraiva, Jorge A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Hyperbaric storage (HS) at variable room temperature (RT) has been proposed as an alternative to refrigeration at atmospheric pressure (RF/AP) for food preservation. Little information is available regarding the effect of HS in meat products. In this study the RT/HS effect was evaluated at 100 MPa and variable RT (≈20 °C) for minced meat preservation up to 24 h, initially for one batch. A further two different batches were studied independently. Microbiological and physicochemical parameters were analyzed to assess the feasibility of RT/HS, using storage at RF/AP and variable RT/AP (≈20 °C), for comparison. A post‐hyperbaric storage (post‐HS) was also tested over 4 days at RF/AP. For the first batch the results showed that RT/HS allowed a decrease of the total aerobic mesophile value (P  6 Log CFU g−1 after 24 h. Similarly, Enterobacteriaceae increased > 1 and > 2 Log CFU g−1 at RF/AP and RT/AP, respectively, while yeasts and molds presented similar and lower overall loads compared to the initial samples for all storage conditions, whereas RT/HS always allowed lower counts to be obtained. Regarding pH, lipid oxidation, and color parameters, RT/HS did not cause significant changes when compared to RF/AP, except after 24 h, where pH increased. The three batches presented similar results, the differences observed being mainly due to the heterogeneity of the samples. RT/HS is a potential quasi‐energetic costless alternative to RF for at least short‐term preservation of minced meat. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry
ISSN:0022-5142
1097-0010
DOI:10.1002/jsfa.9540