High-resolution flat panel CT versus 3-T MR arthrography of the wrist: initial results in vivo

Objectives The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of direct C-arm flat panel computed tomography arthrography (FPCT-A) with direct magnetic resonance arthrography (MR-A) of the wrist in patients with clinically suspected pathologies. Methods Forty-nine patients underwe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2019-06, Vol.29 (6), p.3233-3240
Hauptverfasser: Sonnow, L., Koennecker, S., Luketina, R., Werncke, T., Hinrichs, J. B., Meyer, B. C., Wacker, F. K., von Falck, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of direct C-arm flat panel computed tomography arthrography (FPCT-A) with direct magnetic resonance arthrography (MR-A) of the wrist in patients with clinically suspected pathologies. Methods Forty-nine patients underwent tri-compartmental wrist arthrography. FPCT-A was acquired using a high-resolution acquisition mode, followed by a 3-T MR exam using a dedicated wrist coil. Image quality and artifacts of FPCT-A and MR-A were evaluated with regard to the depictability of anatomical structures. The time stamps for the different image acquisitions were recorded for workflow assessment. Results Image quality was rated significantly superior for all structures for FPCT-A ( p  
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-018-5901-5