Unrelated donor vs HLA-haploidentical α/β T-cell– and B-cell–depleted HSCT in children with acute leukemia

Traditionally, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from both HLA-matched related and unrelated donors (UD) has been used for treating children with acute leukemia (AL) in need of an allograft. Recently, HLA-haploidentical HSCT after αβ T-cell/B-cell depletion (αβhaplo-HSCT) was shown to b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood 2018-12, Vol.132 (24), p.2594-2607
Hauptverfasser: Bertaina, Alice, Zecca, Marco, Buldini, Barbara, Sacchi, Nicoletta, Algeri, Mattia, Saglio, Francesco, Perotti, Cesare, Gallina, Anna Maria, Bertaina, Valentina, Lanino, Edoardo, Prete, Arcangelo, Barberi, Walter, Tumino, Manuela, Favre, Claudio, Cesaro, Simone, Del Bufalo, Francesca, Ripaldi, Mimmo, Boghen, Stella, Casazza, Gabriella, Rabusin, Marco, Balduzzi, Adriana, Fagioli, Franca, Pagliara, Daria, Locatelli, Franco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Traditionally, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from both HLA-matched related and unrelated donors (UD) has been used for treating children with acute leukemia (AL) in need of an allograft. Recently, HLA-haploidentical HSCT after αβ T-cell/B-cell depletion (αβhaplo-HSCT) was shown to be effective in single-center studies. Here, we report the first multicenter retrospective analysis of 127 matched UD (MUD), 118 mismatched UD (MMUD), and 98 αβhaplo-HSCT recipients, transplanted between 2010 and 2015, in 13 Italian centers. All these AL children were transplanted in morphological remission after a myeloablative conditioning regimen. Graft failure occurred in 2% each of UD-HSCT and αβhaplo-HSCT groups. In MUD vs MMUD-HSCT recipients, the cumulative incidence of grade II to IV and grade III to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 35% vs 44% and 6% vs 18%, respectively, compared with 16% and 0% in αβhaplo-HSCT recipients (P < .001). Children treated with αβhaplo-HSCT also had a significantly lower incidence of overall and extensive chronic GVHD (P < .01). Eight (6%) MUD, 32 (28%) MMUD, and 9 (9%) αβhaplo-HSCT patients died of transplant-related complications. With a median follow-up of 3.3 years, the 5-year probability of leukemia-free survival in the 3 groups was 67%, 55%, and 62%, respectively. In the 3 groups, chronic GVHD-free/relapse-free (GRFS) probability of survival was 61%, 34%, and 58%, respectively (P < .001). When compared with patients given MMUD-HSCT, αβhaplo-HSCT recipients had a lower cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality and a better GRFS (P < .001). These data indicate that αβhaplo-HSCT is a suitable therapeutic option for children with AL in need of transplantation, especially when an allele-matched UD is not available. •Children with acute leukemia given αβhaplo-HSCT have a lower risk for acute and chronic GVHD than those transplanted from an unrelated donor.•GVHD-free, relapse-free survival after αβhaplo-HSCT is better than that observed in unrelated donor HSCT recipients. [Display omitted]
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood-2018-07-861575