A Survey of Mohs Tissue Tracking Practices

BACKGROUNDThere are little data regarding error within the multistep process of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). OBJECTIVEA survey of Mohs surgeons was performed to evaluate variation in tissue handling and processing within the MMS process. METHODS AND MATERIALSA 9-question electronic survey was di...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dermatologic surgery 2019-04, Vol.45 (4), p.514-518
Hauptverfasser: Dietert, Jessica B, MacFarlane, Deborah F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUNDThere are little data regarding error within the multistep process of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). OBJECTIVEA survey of Mohs surgeons was performed to evaluate variation in tissue handling and processing within the MMS process. METHODS AND MATERIALSA 9-question electronic survey was distributed to members of the American College of Mohs Micrographic Surgery. A total of 97 responses were analyzed. RESULTSMost surgeons personally transport the tissue (71.1%), most frequently in a specimen container (54.6%). Method of tissue identification during transportation varied significantly. Most surgeons personally hand-draw the map (77.1%). A diagram was most commonly used to convey tissue orientation to the histotechnician (65.4%). Only 31.3% of histotechnicians used labeling of blocks to identify tissue within the cryostat. Most respondents (72.2%) are the only surgeon processing tissue in the laboratory at one time; however, 28.9% reported performing 10 or more cases per day. CONCLUSIONMost respondents are responsible for tissue transport and mapping, which likely reduces potential error. However, the method of transport and labeling, as well as identification by the histotechnician, was more variable. Ultimately, having a consistent process and clear communication with personnel will help reduce potential error during Mohs surgery.
ISSN:1076-0512
1524-4725
DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000001723