Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced voiding urosonogram using second-generation contrast with harmonic imaging (CEVUS-HI) study for assessment of vesicoureteral reflux in children: a meta-analysis
Purpose To assess the diagnostic accuracy and safety of contrast-enhanced voiding urosonogram using second-generation contrast with harmonic imaging (CEVUS-HI) in detecting vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) among children. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in March 2018. Relevant compar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of urology 2019-10, Vol.37 (10), p.2245-2255 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To assess the diagnostic accuracy and safety of contrast-enhanced voiding urosonogram using second-generation contrast with harmonic imaging (CEVUS-HI) in detecting vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) among children.
Methods
A systematic literature search was performed in March 2018. Relevant comparative studies from Medline, EMBASE, World of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, WHO trial registry and Clinicaltrials.gov were identified and appraised using QUADAS-2. Diagnostic accuracy parameters were determined using VCUG as the reference standard. Adverse effects related to ultrasound contrast were summarized. The heterogeneity and inter-study variability were determined. After appropriate subgroup diagnostic accuracy parameters were investigated, summarizing receiver operator characteristics was constructed using the bivariate model meta-regression to determine the area under the curve (AUC).
Results
A total of 12 studies with low–high risk of bias, including 1917 ureteral units from 953 patients were assessed for this meta-analysis. The included studies reported no serious adverse events associated with the ultrasound contrast. The pooled diagnostic accuracy parameters of CEVUS-HI in detecting VUR amongst children were: sensitivity 90.43 (95% CI 90.36–90.50), specificity 92.82 (95% CI 92.76–92.87), the calculated (+) likelihood-ratio 12.59 (95% CI 12.49–12.68), (−) likelihood-ratio of 0.103 (95% CI 0.102–0.104) and extrapolated pooled diagnostic odds-ratio was 122.12 (95% CI 120.75–123.49). Heterogeneity with interstudy variability was noted (
p
70%). The AUC was determined to be 0.965 for VUR detection.
Conclusions
The pooled diagnostic accuracy parameters from low–moderate quality of evidence have illustrated that the CEVUS-HI study has an excellent safety profile and acceptable diagnostic accuracy. It may be considered as an alternative diagnostic modality for assessment of VUR among children. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0724-4983 1433-8726 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00345-018-2587-x |