Commentary on Randomization: The forgotten component of the randomized clinical trial

“We are what we eat.” Raised on a soup of Kempthorne's Chapter 71 (which laid out the basis for inference from randomized clinical trials (RCTs)), Cochran's eminent practicality (don't let arcane theory prevent you from looking at actual data) in his text and classes,2 and Cornfield&#...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Statistics in medicine 2019-01, Vol.38 (1), p.14-16
1. Verfasser: Wittes, Janet Turk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16
container_issue 1
container_start_page 14
container_title Statistics in medicine
container_volume 38
creator Wittes, Janet Turk
description “We are what we eat.” Raised on a soup of Kempthorne's Chapter 71 (which laid out the basis for inference from randomized clinical trials (RCTs)), Cochran's eminent practicality (don't let arcane theory prevent you from looking at actual data) in his text and classes,2 and Cornfield's remarkable ability to experiment with and rethink his views,3 I approach the analysis of RCTs in a somewhat different spirit from that expressed by the provocative paper by Rosenberger, Uschner, and Wang (RUW).4
doi_str_mv 10.1002/sim.7933
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2155164318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2153489705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4493-f044b4b4257b71886574b8f1f337690d6d05e146add03336d1656f85cc077ac43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUQIMobk7BXyABX3zpTJqv1jcZfgwmgm7PJU1TzWiTmbTI_PVmbu5BkPtwH-7hcDkAnGM0xgil18G0Y5ETcgCGGOUiQSnLDsEQpUIkXGA2ACchLBHCmKXiGAwIYkTglAzBYuLaVttO-jV0Fr5IW7nWfMnOOHsD5-8a1s6_ua7TFirXrpyNMHQ17OLJ72hdQdUYa5RsYOeNbE7BUS2boM92ewQW93fzyWMye36YTm5niaI0J0mNKC3jpEyUAmcZZ4KWWY1rQgTPUcUrxDSmXFYVIoTwCnPG64wphYSQipIRuNp6V9599Dp0RWuC0k0jrXZ9KFLMGOaU4Cyil3_Qpeu9jd9tKEKzXMQoe6HyLgSv62LlTRvjFBgVm9RFTF1sUkf0Yifsy1ZXe_C3bQSSLfBpGr3-V1S8Tp9-hN915IZJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2153489705</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Commentary on Randomization: The forgotten component of the randomized clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Wittes, Janet Turk</creator><creatorcontrib>Wittes, Janet Turk</creatorcontrib><description>“We are what we eat.” Raised on a soup of Kempthorne's Chapter 71 (which laid out the basis for inference from randomized clinical trials (RCTs)), Cochran's eminent practicality (don't let arcane theory prevent you from looking at actual data) in his text and classes,2 and Cornfield's remarkable ability to experiment with and rethink his views,3 I approach the analysis of RCTs in a somewhat different spirit from that expressed by the provocative paper by Rosenberger, Uschner, and Wang (RUW).4</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-6715</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sim.7933</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30537123</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; Clinical trials ; Medical statistics ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Research Design ; Research methodology ; Statistical inference</subject><ispartof>Statistics in medicine, 2019-01, Vol.38 (1), p.14-16</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4493-f044b4b4257b71886574b8f1f337690d6d05e146add03336d1656f85cc077ac43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4493-f044b4b4257b71886574b8f1f337690d6d05e146add03336d1656f85cc077ac43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6625-835X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsim.7933$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsim.7933$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30537123$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wittes, Janet Turk</creatorcontrib><title>Commentary on Randomization: The forgotten component of the randomized clinical trial</title><title>Statistics in medicine</title><addtitle>Stat Med</addtitle><description>“We are what we eat.” Raised on a soup of Kempthorne's Chapter 71 (which laid out the basis for inference from randomized clinical trials (RCTs)), Cochran's eminent practicality (don't let arcane theory prevent you from looking at actual data) in his text and classes,2 and Cornfield's remarkable ability to experiment with and rethink his views,3 I approach the analysis of RCTs in a somewhat different spirit from that expressed by the provocative paper by Rosenberger, Uschner, and Wang (RUW).4</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Medical statistics</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Statistical inference</subject><issn>0277-6715</issn><issn>1097-0258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUQIMobk7BXyABX3zpTJqv1jcZfgwmgm7PJU1TzWiTmbTI_PVmbu5BkPtwH-7hcDkAnGM0xgil18G0Y5ETcgCGGOUiQSnLDsEQpUIkXGA2ACchLBHCmKXiGAwIYkTglAzBYuLaVttO-jV0Fr5IW7nWfMnOOHsD5-8a1s6_ua7TFirXrpyNMHQ17OLJ72hdQdUYa5RsYOeNbE7BUS2boM92ewQW93fzyWMye36YTm5niaI0J0mNKC3jpEyUAmcZZ4KWWY1rQgTPUcUrxDSmXFYVIoTwCnPG64wphYSQipIRuNp6V9599Dp0RWuC0k0jrXZ9KFLMGOaU4Cyil3_Qpeu9jd9tKEKzXMQoe6HyLgSv62LlTRvjFBgVm9RFTF1sUkf0Yifsy1ZXe_C3bQSSLfBpGr3-V1S8Tp9-hN915IZJ</recordid><startdate>20190115</startdate><enddate>20190115</enddate><creator>Wittes, Janet Turk</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6625-835X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190115</creationdate><title>Commentary on Randomization: The forgotten component of the randomized clinical trial</title><author>Wittes, Janet Turk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4493-f044b4b4257b71886574b8f1f337690d6d05e146add03336d1656f85cc077ac43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Medical statistics</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Statistical inference</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wittes, Janet Turk</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Statistics in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wittes, Janet Turk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Commentary on Randomization: The forgotten component of the randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Statistics in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Stat Med</addtitle><date>2019-01-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>14</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>14-16</pages><issn>0277-6715</issn><eissn>1097-0258</eissn><abstract>“We are what we eat.” Raised on a soup of Kempthorne's Chapter 71 (which laid out the basis for inference from randomized clinical trials (RCTs)), Cochran's eminent practicality (don't let arcane theory prevent you from looking at actual data) in his text and classes,2 and Cornfield's remarkable ability to experiment with and rethink his views,3 I approach the analysis of RCTs in a somewhat different spirit from that expressed by the provocative paper by Rosenberger, Uschner, and Wang (RUW).4</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30537123</pmid><doi>10.1002/sim.7933</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6625-835X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-6715
ispartof Statistics in medicine, 2019-01, Vol.38 (1), p.14-16
issn 0277-6715
1097-0258
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2155164318
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Clinical outcomes
Clinical trials
Medical statistics
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Research Design
Research methodology
Statistical inference
title Commentary on Randomization: The forgotten component of the randomized clinical trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T00%3A45%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Commentary%20on%20Randomization:%20The%20forgotten%20component%20of%20the%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Statistics%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Wittes,%20Janet%20Turk&rft.date=2019-01-15&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=14-16&rft.issn=0277-6715&rft.eissn=1097-0258&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sim.7933&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2153489705%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2153489705&rft_id=info:pmid/30537123&rfr_iscdi=true