Commentary on Randomization: The forgotten component of the randomized clinical trial
“We are what we eat.” Raised on a soup of Kempthorne's Chapter 71 (which laid out the basis for inference from randomized clinical trials (RCTs)), Cochran's eminent practicality (don't let arcane theory prevent you from looking at actual data) in his text and classes,2 and Cornfield...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Statistics in medicine 2019-01, Vol.38 (1), p.14-16 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | “We are what we eat.” Raised on a soup of Kempthorne's Chapter 71 (which laid out the basis for inference from randomized clinical trials (RCTs)), Cochran's eminent practicality (don't let arcane theory prevent you from looking at actual data) in his text and classes,2 and Cornfield's remarkable ability to experiment with and rethink his views,3 I approach the analysis of RCTs in a somewhat different spirit from that expressed by the provocative paper by Rosenberger, Uschner, and Wang (RUW).4 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0277-6715 1097-0258 |
DOI: | 10.1002/sim.7933 |