Treatment of early-stage laryngeal cancer: A comparison of treatment options

•Multiple treatment modalities are available for early-stage larynx cancer.•Treatment decisions should be made with the intent for organ preservation.•Single-modality therapy is the preferred upfront approach for early stage larynx cancer. Over the course of the last several decades, the treatment o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral oncology 2018-12, Vol.87, p.8-16
Hauptverfasser: Baird, Brandon Jackson, Sung, C. Kwang, Beadle, Beth M., Divi, Vasu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Multiple treatment modalities are available for early-stage larynx cancer.•Treatment decisions should be made with the intent for organ preservation.•Single-modality therapy is the preferred upfront approach for early stage larynx cancer. Over the course of the last several decades, the treatment options for early laryngeal cancers (T1 and T2) have evolved; however, simultaneously the mortality rate has increased. As larynx preservation approaches have become the standard of care, the selection of the proper treatment modality has become paramount. Radiation therapy or transoral laser microsurgery are the most common options for treatment of these early lesions. Oncologic and functional outcomes are considered equivalent between the two modalities for early glottic cancers; however, no direct comparisons exist for robust analysis. In terms of larynx preservation, there also is not compelling data favoring one treatment option or another. For early stage lesions, the goal for any larynx-sparing technique, either radiation or surgery, should be the intent to cure with single modality treatment and minimal short- and long-term toxicity. This article is designed to create a frame of reference for managing early stage disease with respect to lesions of the glottis and supraglottis while weighing treatment implications from an oncologic, functional, and cost perspective.
ISSN:1368-8375
1879-0593
DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.09.012