Comparison of Motor Relearning Program versus Bobath Approach for Prevention of Poststroke Apathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Apathy is a multidimensional syndrome referring to a primary lack of motivation, frequent in survivors of stroke. And prior studies have demonstrated the negative effect of apathy on recovery from stroke. Methods: A randomized controlled study of acute stroke patients. Four hundred and eighty-eight patients without evidence of apathy or depression at the initial visit were consecutively recruited, 258 males and 230 female. Patients were block randomized into 2 groups. Group A (n = 245) and Group B (n = 243) had physiotherapy according to Motor Relearning Program and Bobath in the first 4 weeks, respectively. The supplemental treatment did not differ in the 2 groups. Patients were assessed with Apathy Evaluation Scale-Clinical, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, Barthel Index scores, Mini-Mental State Examination scores, Hamilton Depression Scale scores, and Hamilton Anxiety Scale scores upon admission. At 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up after stroke, patients were assessed for diagnosis and severity of apathy using the Apathy Evaluation Scale-Clinical. Results: Baseline characteristics of the subjects are age mean 65.1 (standard deviations, SD 10.9); 47.1% female; Apathy Evaluation Scale-Clinical mean 24.9 (SD 4.7); National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale mean 3.9 (SD 3.8); Barthel Index mean 87.9 (SD 8.7); Mini-Mental State Examination mean 23.3 (SD 4.5); Hamilton Depression Scale mean 17.5 (SD 6.6); and Hamilton Anxiety Scale mean 14.4 (SD 6.2). Participants in both groups had similar levels of apathy symptoms at study admission (Motor Relearning Program, mean = 24.78, SD = 4.62; Bobath, mean = 25.07, SD = 4.75). The Apathy Evaluation Scale scores of participants in both groups demonstrated to decline gradually from month 1 to month 12. Motor Learning Program participants had significantly less apathy severity compared with Bobath participants with respect to each time point. Participants given Bobath approach were 1.629 times more likely to develop poststroke apathy than patients given Motor Relearning Program over 12 months. Conclusions: Physiotherapy treatment in acute stroke rehabilitation using Motor Relearning program was significantly more effective in preventing of new onset of apathy following stroke compared with Bobath approach.