Comparison of Cryptosporidium-specific and Giardia-specific monoclonal antibodies for monitoring water samples
Routine detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts depend on immunofluorescence assays (IFA) employing fluorescently labeled monoclonal antibodies. Commercially available mAbs used for the detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts are of the IgM or IgG3 subclass, whilst those used for Giardia...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water research (Oxford) 1999, Vol.33 (7), p.1611-1617 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Routine detection of
Cryptosporidium oocysts and
Giardia cysts depend on immunofluorescence assays (IFA) employing fluorescently labeled monoclonal antibodies. Commercially available mAbs used for the detection of
Cryptosporidium oocysts are of the IgM or IgG3 subclass, whilst those used for
Giardia analysis are of IgM and IgG classes including IgG1. These mAbs suffer from non-specific binding to detrital particles present in environmental samples resulting in high levels of background fluorescence. New mAbs of the IgG1 subclass to
Giardia and
Cryptosporidium selected primarily for water analysis have recently become available. These antibodies exhibited lower levels of non-specific particulate binding compared with commercially available antibodies. The degree of background fluorescence observed following mAb staining of particles that were not oocysts or cysts varied between the water types analysed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00398-4 |