Assessment of a practitioner’s perception of scleral contact lens complications

The purpose of this survey was to better understand scleral lens (SL) practitioners’ fitting preferences and minor SL complications and their subsequent treatments. Practitioners who attended the 2017 Global Specialty Lens Symposium were asked to complete an electronic questionnaire that was created...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contact lens & anterior eye 2019-02, Vol.42 (1), p.15-19
Hauptverfasser: Pucker, Andrew D., Bickle, Katherine M., Jones-Jordan, Lisa A., Ticak, Anita, Kwan, Justin T., Kuhn, Jamie, Mathew, Jessica, Kunnen, Carolina M.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose of this survey was to better understand scleral lens (SL) practitioners’ fitting preferences and minor SL complications and their subsequent treatments. Practitioners who attended the 2017 Global Specialty Lens Symposium were asked to complete an electronic questionnaire that was created by the investigators, a survey that asked practitioners about their SL fitting experience and preferences, their patients’ experience with poor SL wetting, SL fogging, ocular symptoms (redness, pain/discomfort, dryness), and blurred central and side vision, and how the practitioners treated these conditions. This study analyzed data from 164 SL practitioners. The practitioners had been in practice for 16.3 ± 13.4 years, had been fitting SL for 5.5 ± 5.0 years, and fit 7.4 ± 7.1 SL/month. Practitioners preferred a SL with a final central corneal clearance of ∼200 μm and an overall diameter between 15.1 mm to 16.5 mm. Poor SL wetting (90.8% of practitioners documented condition), SL fogging (84.8%), blurred central vision (40.2%), ocular redness (34.8%), ocular dryness (24.4%), ocular pain/discomfort (20.7%), and blurred side vision (12.8%) were encountered by the practitioners. Practitioners preferred treating poor wetting and fogging with lens removal, cleaning, and reapplication, blurred central vision with a lens power change, blurred side (peripheral) vision, ocular redness, and ocular pain with a lens parameter change, and dryness with artificial tears. Most SL practitioners preferred a SL central corneal clearance of ∼200 μm, and they occasionally encountered SL-related complications in their practice, which they treated similarly to corneal gas permeable CLs.
ISSN:1367-0484
1476-5411
DOI:10.1016/j.clae.2018.11.003