Incidence and Prevalence of Delirium Subtypes in an Adult ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES:Use systematic review and meta-analytic methodology to estimate the pooled incidence, prevalence, and proportion of delirium cases for each delirium subtype (hypoactive, hyperactive, and mixed) in an adult ICU population. DATA SOURCES:We conducted a search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical care medicine 2018-12, Vol.46 (12), p.2029-2035 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVES:Use systematic review and meta-analytic methodology to estimate the pooled incidence, prevalence, and proportion of delirium cases for each delirium subtype (hypoactive, hyperactive, and mixed) in an adult ICU population.
DATA SOURCES:We conducted a search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards from database inception until October 22, 2017, with no restrictions.
STUDY SELECTION:We included original research conducted in adults admitted to any medical, surgical, or speciality ICU that reported incidence or prevalence estimates of delirium according to delirium subtype.
DATA EXTRACTION:Data were extracted on sample size, population demographics, condition information, and reported delirium estimates.
DATA SYNTHESIS:Forty-eight studies (27,342 patients; 4,550 with delirium) with an overall pooled prevalence of 31% (95% CI, 24–41; I = 99%) met inclusion criteria. The pooled incidence (n = 18 studies) of delirium subtypes were hyperactive (4% [95% CI, 2–6]; I = 92%]), hypoactive (11% [95% CI, 8–17; I = 97%]), and mixed (7% [95% CI, 4–11; I = 97%]). The pooled prevalence (n = 31 studies) of delirium subtypes were hyperactive (4% [95% CI, 3–6; I = 94%]), hypoactive (17% [95% CI, 13–22; I = 97%]), and mixed (10% [95% CI, 6–16; I = 99%]). The pooled prevalence of hypoactive delirium in study populations with a similarly high severity of illness or mechanically ventilated was higher (severity of illness29% [95% CI, 18–46%; I = 95%], 100% mechanically ventilated35% [95% CI, 23–55%; I = 93%]) compared with the pooled prevalence of hypoactive delirium.
CONCLUSIONS:Despite significant heterogeneity between studies, these data show the majority of delirious ICU patients to have hypoactive delirium, a finding with potential monitoring, management, and prognostic implications. The prevalence of hypoactive delirium varies between-study populations and is higher in patients with greater severity of illness. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-3493 1530-0293 |
DOI: | 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003402 |