Neuroprotection by anaesthetics in rodent models of traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Anaesthetic neuroprotection in the setting of traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains unproved and is based upon the results in preclinical experiments. Here, we sought to synthesise the results in rodent models of TBI, and to evaluate the effects of publication bias, experimental manipulation, and poo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2018-12, Vol.121 (6), p.1272-1281
Hauptverfasser: Archer, D.P., McCann, S.K., Walker, A.M., Premji, Z.A., Rogan, K.J., Hutton, M.J.H., Gray, L.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Anaesthetic neuroprotection in the setting of traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains unproved and is based upon the results in preclinical experiments. Here, we sought to synthesise the results in rodent models of TBI, and to evaluate the effects of publication bias, experimental manipulation, and poor study quality on the effect estimates. After a systematic review, we used pairwise meta-analysis to estimate the effect of anaesthetics, opioids, and sedative–hypnotics on neurological outcome, and network meta-analysis to compare their relative efficacy. We sought evidence of bias related to selective publication, experimental manipulation, and study quality. Sixteen studies, involving 32 comparisons, were included (546 animals). The treatment improved the neurological outcomes by 35%; 95% confidence interval: 26–44%; P
ISSN:0007-0912
1471-6771
DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2018.07.024