Acoustic scattering comparison of Kirchhoff approximation to Rayleigh-Fourier method for sinusoidal surface waves at low grazing angles
The Fourier series method for implementing the Rayleigh hypothesis [Rayleigh-Fourier method (RFM)] is used as a reference solution to assess the Kirchhoff approximation of the Helmholtz integral [Helmholtz-Kirchhoff approximation (HKA)] for modeling broadband scatter from sinusoidal surfaces at low...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2018-09, Vol.144 (3), p.1269-1278 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The Fourier series method for implementing the Rayleigh hypothesis [Rayleigh-Fourier
method (RFM)] is used as a reference solution to assess the Kirchhoff approximation
of the Helmholtz integral [Helmholtz-Kirchhoff approximation (HKA)] for modeling
broadband scatter from sinusoidal surfaces at low grazing angles. The HKA is a
valuable solution because it has an eigen-ray interpretation without unbounded
caustic amplitudes and discontinuous shadow zones. Plane wave studies of the HKA,
however, show it becomes inaccurate at low grazing angles. This study quantifies how
this limitation manifests with increasing transmission distance for time domain
scattering simulations. Scattering results are compared over a complete surface wave
cycle with parameters modeling sea surface-swell. The HKA agrees reasonably well with
the RFM in point source calculations for limited extensions of transmission distances
beyond where plane wave comparisons begin to diverge. Past these distances, HKA
solutions begin to show significant over-prediction of the acoustic amplitude around
late arrivals. This over-prediction is frequency dependent and eigen-ray interference
offers an explanation of this behavior. Further extending the transmission range
leads to a significant HKA error, and a range is found at which flat surface
reflections have less error. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-4966 1520-8524 |
DOI: | 10.1121/1.5052256 |