Models of Peer Support to Remediate Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: A Report Developed by the Society of Critical Care Medicine Thrive International Peer Support Collaborative

OBJECTIVES:Patients and caregivers can experience a range of physical, psychologic, and cognitive problems following critical care discharge. The use of peer support has been proposed as an innovative support mechanism. DESIGN:We sought to identify technical, safety, and procedural aspects of existi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care medicine 2019-01, Vol.47 (1), p.e21-e27
Hauptverfasser: McPeake, Joanne, Hirshberg, Eliotte L., Christie, Leeann M., Drumright, Kelly, Haines, Kimberley, Hough, Catherine L., Meyer, Joel, Wade, Dorothy, Andrews, Adair, Bakhru, Rita, Bates, Samantha, Barwise, John A., Bastarache, Julie, Beesley, Sarah J., Boehm, Leanne M., Brown, Sheryl, Clay, Alison S., Firshman, Penelope, Greenberg, Steven, Harris, Wendy, Hill, Christopher, Hodgson, Carol, Holdsworth, Clare, Hope, Aluko A., Hopkins, Ramona O., Howell, David C. J., Janssen, Anna, Jackson, James C., Johnson, Annie, Kross, Erin K., Lamas, Daniela, MacLeod-Smith, Belinda, Mandel, Ruth, Marshall, John, Mikkelsen, Mark E., Nackino, Megan, Quasim, Tara, Sevin, Carla M., Slack, Andrew, Spurr, Rachel, Still, Mary, Thompson, Carol, Weinhouse, Gerald, Wilcox, M. Elizabeth, Iwashyna, Theodore J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVES:Patients and caregivers can experience a range of physical, psychologic, and cognitive problems following critical care discharge. The use of peer support has been proposed as an innovative support mechanism. DESIGN:We sought to identify technical, safety, and procedural aspects of existing operational models of peer support, among the Society of Critical Care Medicine Thrive Peer Support Collaborative. We also sought to categorize key distinctions between these models and elucidate barriers and facilitators to implementation. SUBJECTS AND SETTING:Seventeen Thrive sites from the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia were represented by a range of healthcare professionals. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Via an iterative process of in-person and email/conference calls, members of the Collaborative defined the key areas on which peer support models could be defined and compared, collected detailed self-reports from all sites, reviewed the information, and identified clusters of models. Barriers and challenges to implementation of peer support models were also documented. Within the Thrive Collaborative, six general models of peer support were identifiedcommunity based, psychologist-led outpatient, models-based within ICU follow-up clinics, online, groups based within ICU, and peer mentor models. The most common barriers to implementation were recruitment to groups, personnel input and training, sustainability and funding, risk management, and measuring success. CONCLUSIONS:A number of different models of peer support are currently being developed to help patients and families recover and grow in the postcritical care setting.
ISSN:0090-3493
1530-0293
DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000003497