A case for not adjusting birthweight customized standards for ethnicity: observations from a unique Australian cohort

Low birthweight is more common in infants of indigenous (Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander) than of White Australian mothers. Controversy exists on whether fetal growth is normally different in different populations. We sought to determine the relationships of birthweight, birthweight percent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2019-03, Vol.220 (3), p.277.e1-277.e10
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Roger, Mohapatra, Lita, Hunter, Mandy, Evans, Tiffany-Jane, Oldmeadow, Christopher, Holliday, Elizabeth, Hure, Alexis, Attia, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Low birthweight is more common in infants of indigenous (Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander) than of White Australian mothers. Controversy exists on whether fetal growth is normally different in different populations. We sought to determine the relationships of birthweight, birthweight percentiles, and smoking with perinatal outcomes in indigenous vs nonindigenous infants to determine whether the White infant growth charts could be applied to indigenous infants. Data were analyzed for indigenous status, maternal age and smoking, and perinatal outcomes in 45,754 singleton liveborn infants of at least 20 weeks gestation or 400 g birthweight delivered in New South Wales, Australia, between June 2010 and July 2015. Indigenous infants (n=6372; 14%) had a mean birthweight 67 g lower than nonindigenous infants (P
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.094