A case for not adjusting birthweight customized standards for ethnicity: observations from a unique Australian cohort
Low birthweight is more common in infants of indigenous (Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander) than of White Australian mothers. Controversy exists on whether fetal growth is normally different in different populations. We sought to determine the relationships of birthweight, birthweight percent...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2019-03, Vol.220 (3), p.277.e1-277.e10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Low birthweight is more common in infants of indigenous (Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander) than of White Australian mothers. Controversy exists on whether fetal growth is normally different in different populations.
We sought to determine the relationships of birthweight, birthweight percentiles, and smoking with perinatal outcomes in indigenous vs nonindigenous infants to determine whether the White infant growth charts could be applied to indigenous infants.
Data were analyzed for indigenous status, maternal age and smoking, and perinatal outcomes in 45,754 singleton liveborn infants of at least 20 weeks gestation or 400 g birthweight delivered in New South Wales, Australia, between June 2010 and July 2015.
Indigenous infants (n=6372; 14%) had a mean birthweight 67 g lower than nonindigenous infants (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9378 1097-6868 1097-6868 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.094 |