Acute aortic dissections with entry tear in the arch: A report from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection

To analyze presentation, management, and outcomes of acute aortic dissections with proximal entry tear in the arch. Patients enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection and entry tear in the arch were classified into 2 groups: arch A (retrograde extension into the ascending aor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2019-01, Vol.157 (1), p.66-73
Hauptverfasser: Trimarchi, Santi, de Beaufort, Hector W.L., Tolenaar, Jip L., Bavaria, Joseph E., Desai, Nimesh D., Di Eusanio, Marco, Di Bartolomeo, Roberto, Peterson, Mark D., Ehrlich, Marek, Evangelista, Arturo, Montgomery, Daniel G., Myrmel, Truls, Hughes, G. Chad, Appoo, Jehangir J., De Vincentiis, Carlo, Yan, Tristan D., Nienaber, Christoph A., Isselbacher, Eric M., Deeb, G. Michael, Gleason, Thomas G., Patel, Himanshu J., Sundt, Thoralf M., Eagle, Kim A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To analyze presentation, management, and outcomes of acute aortic dissections with proximal entry tear in the arch. Patients enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection and entry tear in the arch were classified into 2 groups: arch A (retrograde extension into the ascending aorta with or without antegrade extension) and arch B (only antegrade extension into the descending aorta or further distally). Presentation, management, and in-hospital outcomes of the 2 groups were compared. The arch A (n = 228) and arch B (n = 140) groups were similar concerning the presence of any preoperative complication (68.4% vs 60.0%; P = .115), but the types of complication were different. Arch A presented more commonly with shock, neurologic complications, cardiac tamponade, and grade 3 or 4 aortic valve insufficiency and less frequently with refractory hypertension, visceral ischemia, extension of dissection, and aortic rupture. Management for both groups were open surgery (77.6% vs 18.6%; P 
ISSN:0022-5223
1097-685X
DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.07.101