Is the global tuberculosis control strategy too big to fail?
In 1996 WHO stated that “MDR-tuberculosis is too expensive to treat in poor countries; it detracts attention and resources from treating drug-susceptible cases”.3 Faith in directly observed treatment, short course (DOTS) slowly eroded, because leaving people with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis unt...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2018-11, Vol.392 (10160), p.2165-2165 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In 1996 WHO stated that “MDR-tuberculosis is too expensive to treat in poor countries; it detracts attention and resources from treating drug-susceptible cases”.3 Faith in directly observed treatment, short course (DOTS) slowly eroded, because leaving people with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis untreated was increasingly recognised as being both unethical and a bad tuberculosis control strategy. From 2003 to 2017, $43 billion were budgeted by international and domestic sources for control of tuberculosis and HIV-associated tuberculosis (appendix).5 Resource allocation data are scarce, so past investments are difficult to match with their effect on service delivery and health. [...]serious doubts remain about the impact of investing millions of dollars to deploy the Xpert MTB/RIF assay to diagnose tuberculosis and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in endemic countries.6 It is also very difficult to know with certainty what proportion of resources are being used to provide direct services to people with tuberculosis. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32751-X |