Randomized Phase II study of two opposite administration sequences of irinotecan and cisplatin in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND Combined chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) is active in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). However, the optimal administration schedule needs to be defined to maximize its synergic effect. The authors evaluated the efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics (P...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2006-02, Vol.106 (4), p.873-880
Hauptverfasser: Han, Ji‐Youn, Lim, Hyeong‐Seok, Lee, Dae Ho, Ju, So Young, Lee, Sung Young, Kim, Hyae Young, Park, Yong‐Hoon, Park, Chun Gun, Lee, Jin Soo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND Combined chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) is active in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). However, the optimal administration schedule needs to be defined to maximize its synergic effect. The authors evaluated the efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of IP chemotherapy given on two administration sequences in chemotherapy‐naive patients with NSCLC. METHODS Eighty eligible patients were assigned randomly to receive 1 of 2 irinotecan and cisplatin administration sequences on Day 1: irinotecan followed by cisplatin (I‐P) (n = 39 patients) or cisplatin followed by irinotecan (P‐I) (n = 41 patients). Treatment was comprised of irinotecan at a dose of 80 mg/m2 intravenously on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin at a dose of 60 mg/m2 intravenously on Day 1 of a 21‐day cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles. For PK analysis, serial plasma samples were obtained on Day 1 of the first cycle. RESULTS In total, 77 patients were assessable for efficacy. The overall response rate was 47%, and there was a trend in favor of P‐I (54%) compared with I‐P (39%). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the P‐I sequence and female gender were found to be significant predictors of a better response (P = 0.047 and P = 0.011, respectively). Overall toxicity profiles and PK parameters were similar in both arms. CONCLUSIONS IP chemotherapy showed promising activity with a favorable 1‐year survival rate. For future clinical use, the authors recommend administering cisplatin first and then irinotecan, because that sequence was associated with a higher response rate. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society. The efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of combined chemotherapy with irinotecan and cisplatin were evaluated according to administration sequence in chemotherapy‐naive patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. For future clinical use, the authors recommend administering cisplatin first and then irinotecan, because that sequence was associated with a higher response rate.
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.21668