Chemoradiotherapy with and without deep regional hyperthermia for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus

Purpose To compare results after chemoradiotherapy with and without deep regional hyperthermia in patients with anal cancer. Methods Between 2000 and 2015, a total of 112 consecutive patients with UICC stage I–IV anal cancer received chemoradiotherapy with 5‑fluororuracil and mitomycin C (CRT). In c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 2019-07, Vol.195 (7), p.607-614
Hauptverfasser: Ott, Oliver J., Schmidt, Manfred, Semrau, Sabine, Strnad, Vratislav, Matzel, Klaus E., Schneider, Ignaz, Raptis, Dimitrios, Uter, Wolfgang, Grützmann, Robert, Fietkau, Rainer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To compare results after chemoradiotherapy with and without deep regional hyperthermia in patients with anal cancer. Methods Between 2000 and 2015, a total of 112 consecutive patients with UICC stage I–IV anal cancer received chemoradiotherapy with 5‑fluororuracil and mitomycin C (CRT). In case of insufficient tumor response 4–6 weeks after chemoradiotherapy, patients received an interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy boost. Additionally, 50/112 patients received hyperthermia treatments (HCRT). Results Median follow-up was 41 (2–165) months. After 5 years follow-up, overall (95.8 vs. 74.5%, P  = 0.045), disease-free (89.1 vs. 70.4%, P  = 0.027), local recurrence-free (97.7 vs. 78.7%, P  = 0.006), and colostomy-free survival rates (87.7 vs. 69.0%, P  = 0.016) were better for the HCRT group. Disease-specific, regional failure-free, and distant metastasis-free survival rates showed no significant differences. The adjusted hazard ratios for death were 0.25 (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.92; P  = 0.036) and for local recurrence 0.14 (95% CI, 0.02 to 1.09; P  = 0.06), respectively. Grades 3–4 early toxicities were comparable with the exception of hematotoxicity, which was higher in the HCRT group (66 vs. 43%, P  = 0.032). Incidences of late side effects were similar with the exception of a higher telangiectasia rate in the HCRT group (38.0 vs. 16.1%, P  = 0.009). Conclusion Additional regional hyperthermia improved overall survival, local control, and colostomy rates. Its potential beneficial role has to be confirmed in a prospective randomized setting. Therefore, the HyCAN trial has already been established by our group and is currently recruiting patients (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02369939).
ISSN:0179-7158
1439-099X
DOI:10.1007/s00066-018-1396-x