Four Myths About The Supreme Court

In trying to give meaning to such inherently elastic concepts as "equal protection of the laws" and "due process," Justices inevitably make subjective judgments that are colored by their individual views about right and wrong, fair and unfair, wise and unwise. [...] there is a re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Time (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 2009-06, Vol.173 (22), p.30
1. Verfasser: Lazarus, Edward
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In trying to give meaning to such inherently elastic concepts as "equal protection of the laws" and "due process," Justices inevitably make subjective judgments that are colored by their individual views about right and wrong, fair and unfair, wise and unwise. [...] there is a reason Clarence Thomas, who grew up resenting the racial preferences that took him up the educational ladder to Yale Law School, reads the Constitution as imposing absolute color blindness on government actions.
ISSN:0040-781X
2169-1665