Same‐session endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography‐based tissue sampling in suspected malignant biliary obstruction: A multicenter experience
Background and Aim Few studies compared endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐guided fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)‐based tissue sampling in terms of diagnostic accuracy in suspected malignant biliary obstruction. We evaluated and compared the diagn...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2019-04, Vol.34 (4), p.799-805 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background and Aim
Few studies compared endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)‐guided fine needle aspiration (EUS‐FNA) with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)‐based tissue sampling in terms of diagnostic accuracy in suspected malignant biliary obstruction. We evaluated and compared the diagnostic performance of EUS‐FNA and ERCP‐based tissue sampling.
Methods
This multicenter study included 263 patients with suspected malignant biliary obstruction who underwent same‐session EUS and ERCP between 2012 and 2016.
Results
Malignancies were confirmed in 239 patients (90.9%) and benign in 24 patients (9.1%). Overall diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy were 73.6% and 76.1% for EUS‐FNA, 56.5% and 60.5% for ERCP, and 85.8% and 87.1% for EUS/ERCP combination. EUS‐FNA showed higher overall performances compared with ERCP (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0815-9319 1440-1746 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jgh.14528 |