Neurotoxicity of FOLFOX-4 as adjuvant treatment for patients with colon and gastric cancer: a randomized study of two different schedules of oxaliplatin
Purpose The dose limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin (l-HOP) is neurotoxicity, which is characterized by an acute neuropathy and a clinically distinct chronic neuropathy. This randomized study evaluated if prolonged l-HOP infusion over the conventional l-HOP schedule was useful in reducing acute and po...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 2008-01, Vol.61 (1), p.105-111 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
The dose limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin (l-HOP) is neurotoxicity, which is characterized by an acute neuropathy and a clinically distinct chronic neuropathy. This randomized study evaluated if prolonged l-HOP infusion over the conventional l-HOP schedule was useful in reducing acute and possibly chronic l-HOP induced neurotoxicity in colon and gastric cancer patients receiving l-HOP-based regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy.
Methods
Sixty-four patients were randomly assigned to group A (26 colon and 6 gastric cancer) and to group B (23 colon and 9 gastric cancer). Chemotherapy in both groups consisted of l-HOP 85 mg/m
2
i.v. only on day 1, with leucovorin 100 mg/m
2
i.v. as a 2-h infusion followed by bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m
2
/day and a 22-h infusion of 5-FU 600 mg/m
2
/day, repeated for two consecutive days every 2 weeks for a maximum of 12 cycles. Patients in group A received l-HOP as a continuous 6-h i.v. infusion, and patients in group B received l-HOP as the conventional 2-h i.v. infusion.
Results
The percentage of patients presenting with grade ≥2 neurotoxicity was statistically lower in group A than in group B (28.1% vs. 59.3%:
P
= 0.02). There was a statistically lower percentage of cycles with grade ≥2 neurotoxicity in group A (6.1%) than in group B (18.5%) (
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0344-5704 1432-0843 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00280-007-0454-3 |