Outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprostheses, failed annuloplasty rings, and mitral annular calcification

Abstract Aims We sought to evaluate the outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) for patients with degenerated bioprostheses [valve-in-valve (ViV)], failed annuloplasty rings [valve-in-ring (ViR)], and severe mitral annular calcification [valve-in-mitral annular calcification (ViMAC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2019-02, Vol.40 (5), p.441-451
Hauptverfasser: Yoon, Sung-Han, Whisenant, Brian K, Bleiziffer, Sabine, Delgado, Victoria, Dhoble, Abhijeet, Schofer, Niklas, Eschenbach, Lena, Bansal, Eric, Murdoch, Dale J, Ancona, Marco, Schmidt, Tobias, Yzeiraj, Ermela, Vincent, Flavien, Niikura, Hiroki, Kim, Won-Keun, Asami, Masahiko, Unbehaun, Axel, Hirji, Sameer, Fujita, Buntaro, Silaschi, Miriam, Tang, Gilbert H L, Kuwata, Shingo, Wong, S Chiu, Frangieh, Antonio H, Barker, Colin M, Davies, James E, Lauten, Alexander, Deuschl, Florian, Nombela-Franco, Luis, Rampat, Rajiv, Nicz, Pedro Felipe Gomes, Masson, Jean-Bernard, Wijeysundera, Harindra C, Sievert, Horst, Blackman, Daniel J, Gutierrez-Ibanes, Enrique, Sugiyama, Daisuke, Chakravarty, Tarun, Hildick-Smith, David, de Brito, Fabio Sandoli, Jensen, Christoph, Jung, Christian, Smalling, Richard W, Arnold, Martin, Redwood, Simon, Kasel, Albert Markus, Maisano, Francesco, Treede, Hendrik, Ensminger, Stephan M, Kar, Saibal, Kaneko, Tsuyoshi, Pilgrim, Thomas, Sorajja, Paul, Van Belle, Eric, Prendergast, Bernard D, Bapat, Vinayak, Modine, Thomas, Schofer, Joachim, Frerker, Christian, Kempfert, Joerg, Attizzani, Guilherme F, Latib, Azeem, Schaefer, Ulrich, Webb, John G, Bax, Jeroen J, Makkar, Raj R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Aims We sought to evaluate the outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) for patients with degenerated bioprostheses [valve-in-valve (ViV)], failed annuloplasty rings [valve-in-ring (ViR)], and severe mitral annular calcification [valve-in-mitral annular calcification (ViMAC)]. Methods and results From the TMVR multicentre registry, procedural and clinical outcomes of ViV, ViR, and ViMAC were compared according to Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) criteria. A total of 521 patients with mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 9.0 ± 7.0% underwent TMVR (322 patients with ViV, 141 with ViR, and 58 with ViMAC). Trans-septal access and the Sapien valves were used in 39.5% and 90.0%, respectively. Overall technical success was excellent at 87.1%. However, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction occurred more frequently after ViMAC compared with ViR and ViV (39.7% vs. 5.0% vs. 2.2%; P 
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy590