Comparison of efficacy and safety of intralesional triamcinolone and combination of triamcinolone with 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars: Randomised control trial
•Intralesional 5-fluorouracil is safe to administer, usually more superficial injection results in skin ulceration.•Triamcinolone reduces the local side effects of 5-fluorouracil when injected in combination.•Long term results of the 5-fluorouracil and triamcinolone is better than the traditional us...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Burns 2019-02, Vol.45 (1), p.69-75 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Intralesional 5-fluorouracil is safe to administer, usually more superficial injection results in skin ulceration.•Triamcinolone reduces the local side effects of 5-fluorouracil when injected in combination.•Long term results of the 5-fluorouracil and triamcinolone is better than the traditional use of Triamcinolone alone.
The treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scar is challenging with no universally accepted mode for permanent ablation. Conventional therapies yield unpredictable results, significant complications and require elaborate hardware.
The objective was to establish the safety and efficacy of intralesional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars.
Randomized controlled trial (RCT).
It was conducted at the Jinnah Burn and Reconstructive Surgery Center/Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan from May 2012 to March 2013.
We included 120 patients divided in two groups. The group A patients received intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) and the group B patients received both 5-FU and TAC. 8 injections at a week interval were given and patients were evaluated at the start of treatment and then at 4th and at 8th week during the treatment and then 4 weeks after the end of treatment. Patents were assessed for mean reduction in scar height, efficacy and complications.
Total of 108 patients completed the study. The mean reduction in the scar height in group B (5-FU+TAC) 1.144+.4717 was markedly better than that of group A (TAC alone) 1.894+1.0751 (t=4.781, p=.000). The efficacy (defined previously as >50% reduction in initial scar height) was superior in group B 44 (77.2%) than that of group A 25 (49.0% (X2=9.260, p=.002). Recurrence was seen in 39.2% (20) of patients of the group A while in only 17.5% (10) of the cases of group B (P=0.012). Mean follow up was of 22 months.
5-FU+TAC is safe, easy to administer and effective treatment for problematic scars and has the lower rate of recurrence on larger follow up. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0305-4179 1879-1409 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.burns.2018.08.011 |