Treatment Outcome of Oral Leukoplakia with Er:YAG Laser: A 5-Year Follow-Up Prospective Comparative Study

Objective: The purpose of this prospective analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of erbium-substituted yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser compared with that of conventional surgery, regarding the long-term outcome of nondysplastic oral leukoplakias (OL). Background: To date, this comparison has...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Photomedicine and laser surgery 2018-12, Vol.36 (12), p.631-633
Hauptverfasser: Arduino, Paolo Giacomo, Cafaro, Adriana, Cabras, Marco, Gambino, Alessio, Broccoletti, Roberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: The purpose of this prospective analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of erbium-substituted yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser compared with that of conventional surgery, regarding the long-term outcome of nondysplastic oral leukoplakias (OL). Background: To date, this comparison has never been performed. Methods: Patients were randomly allocated to two different groups: some underwent surgical excision with traditional scalpel (Group TrSc) and others underwent an ablative session with Er:YAG laser (Group Las), with these modalities: 1.5-W power, 150-mJ pulse energy, 10-Hz frequency, 500-μs pulse duration, and 0.9-mm spot size. During the follow-up period, the evolution of the OL was listed as (1) healing: if novel lesions did not appear in the same place of the surgery and (2) recurrence: if a new mucosal change has been detailed in the equivalent place of the primary disease. Results: One hundred seventeen lesions were treated. Fifty-eight lesions underwent surgery with traditional scalpel, whereas 59 underwent laser surgery. Follow-up ranged from 24 to 108 months (median of 58). Healing was detailed for 52.99% (n = 62) of the 117 OL, with no statistical differences between the two randomized groups. Conclusions: It seems reasonable to consider the Er:YAG laser as effective as traditional scalpel in terms of healing for OL, with the same rate of recurrences in a period of almost 5 years.
ISSN:1557-8550
1557-8550
DOI:10.1089/pho.2018.4491