Evaluation of the treatment costs and duration of topical treatments for multiple actinic keratosis based on the area of the cancerization field and not on the number of lesions

Background The cost of topical treatments for actinic keratosis (AK) has historically been evaluated in relation to the number of lesions requiring treatment or simply by the price of a single tube/sachet of the drug used. Objective To demonstrate a new method of costing topical treatments in AK, wh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2019-02, Vol.33 (2), p.312-317
Hauptverfasser: Calzavara‐Pinton, P., Tanova, N., Hamon, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The cost of topical treatments for actinic keratosis (AK) has historically been evaluated in relation to the number of lesions requiring treatment or simply by the price of a single tube/sachet of the drug used. Objective To demonstrate a new method of costing topical treatments in AK, which takes into account the actual cancerization area treated. Methods In order to evaluate the actual cost of each treatment, the official approval status of the drug was used to estimate the amount of cream needed per one cm2. This value was then applied to the hypothetical cancerization area sizes to demonstrate the impact of the size treated on the actual cost of treatment. The price considered was the ex‐factory price in Italy. Results Areas which could be treated with a single tube/sachet of Metvix®, Picato®, Aldara®, Solaraze® and Zyclara® were 200, 25, 25, 33.3 and 200 cm2, respectively. For the treatment of smaller areas (
ISSN:0926-9959
1468-3083
DOI:10.1111/jdv.15269