Randomized controlled trial of a community-based intervention on HIV and nutritional outcomes at 6 months among women living with HIV/AIDS in rural India
OBJECTIVE:To assess the impact of nurse-led Asha (Accredited Social Health Activist)-support behavioral and nutritional intervention among women living with HIV/AIDS (WLH/A) in rural India. DESIGN:Cluster randomized controlled trial. METHODS:Sixteen Primary Health Centers serving WLH/A in Andhra Pra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | AIDS (London) 2018-11, Vol.32 (18), p.2727-2737 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVE:To assess the impact of nurse-led Asha (Accredited Social Health Activist)-support behavioral and nutritional intervention among women living with HIV/AIDS (WLH/A) in rural India.
DESIGN:Cluster randomized controlled trial.
METHODS:Sixteen Primary Health Centers serving WLH/A in Andhra Pradesh were grouped into four regional clusters that were randomly allocated into one of four arms. All four groups included Asha-support and consisted ofAsha-support only (control group); nutrition education; nutrition supplementation; and the combination of supplementation and education. Differences between baseline and 6-month follow-up for key physiological outcomes (BMI, CD4 cell count) were analyzed using factorial mixed models that accounted for geographic clustering.
RESULTS:At 6 months, all groups improved CD4 cell countAsha only [mean difference score (D) = 343.97, standard deviation (SD) = 106.94], nutrition education (D = 356.15, SD = 0.69), nutrition supplement (D = 469.66, SD = 116.0), and nutrition supplement and education (D = 530.82, SD = 128.56). In multivariable models, Asha-support and nutrition, and Asha-support and nutrition supplement interventions demonstrated independent significant improvements in CD4 cell count; the interaction term was significant [estimate = 529.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 512.0, 547.8; P = 0.006]. BMI also increased for all groupsAsha only (D = 0.95, SD = 0.82), Asha and nutrition education (D = 1.28, SD = 0.53), Asha and nutrition supplement (D = 2.38, SD = 0.60), nutrition supplement, and nutrition supplement and education (D = 2.72, SD = 0.84). Nutrition supplementation and nutrition education demonstrated independent effects on BMI; the interaction term was not significant (estimate = 0.27; 95% CI = 2.5, 2.7; P = 0.80).
CONCLUSION:Interventions supported by community workers were efficacious at improving physiological outcomes and may be beneficial at meeting critical healthcare needs of vulnerable WLH/A in India. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0269-9370 1473-5571 |
DOI: | 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002016 |