Microscopic examination of urine sediment: Phase contrast versus bright field
Today, phase contrast microscopy (PCM) is the recommended technique for manual urinary sediment (U-sed) examination. In fact, compared to bright field microscopy (BFM), it allows a better identification of most U-sed particles. The main contributions, both as original papers in medical journals and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinica chimica acta 2018-12, Vol.487, p.168-173 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Today, phase contrast microscopy (PCM) is the recommended technique for manual urinary sediment (U-sed) examination. In fact, compared to bright field microscopy (BFM), it allows a better identification of most U-sed particles.
The main contributions, both as original papers in medical journals and as monographs on PCM applied to U-sed examination, published in the period 1950–1982 (which was chosen because it includes the results of the most important investigations on the subject) were identified and analysed. Moreover, a brief analysis on the use of PCM in U-sed examination today was carried out.
After the discovery of PCM by the Dutch physicist Frits Zernike in the 1930s, several contributions were published, most of which are forgotten today. All of them demonstrated the advantages of PCM over BFM in identifying the U-sed particles, especially casts, renal tubular epithelial cells, atypical urothelial cells associated with urothelial carcinoma, and erythrocytes (which for the 1st time were classified as dysmorphic - of glomerular origin - and isomorphic - of non glomerular origin). The analysis of six recent monographs on U-sed or urinalysis, written in English and with an international distribution, demonstrated that only in two of them the U-sed particles were mostly shown by PCM.
Several papers and monographs, published since the early 1950s, have demonstrated the advantages of PCM over BFM for U-sed examination. In spite of this, PCM is not as widely used as it should be.
•The review of the literature of the period 1950-1982 shows that several authors have investigated the use of phase contrast microscopy in the evaluation of urinary sediment.•All the authors have described the advantages of phase contrast microscopy over traditional bright field microscopy in identifying the particles of the urinary sediment, especially epithelial cells, casts, and erythrocyte morphology.•In spite of these results, today the use of phase contrast microscopy for urinary sediment examination is not as diffused as it should be. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0009-8981 1873-3492 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cca.2018.09.036 |