Co-production from proposal to paper

Three examples show how public participation in research can be extended at every step of the process to generate useful knowledge. Three examples show how public participation in research can be extended at every step of the process to generate useful knowledge.

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Nature (London) 2018-10, Vol.562 (7725), p.29-31
Hauptverfasser:	Hickey, Gary, Richards, Tessa, Sheehy, Jeff
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	706/648/276 706/648/496 706/689/522 Acquired immune deficiency syndrome Action research Advocacy AIDS Alcohol Caregivers Child Children Clinical decision making Clinical Trials as Topic - economics comment Decision making Feedback Financing, Organized Grants HIV Infections - drug therapy Humanities and Social Sciences Humans Medical research Methods multidisciplinary Older people Patient Advocacy Patient Participation Patients Peer Review, Research - methods Physical therapy Prostheses Prostheses and implants Regenerative Medicine - economics Rehabilitation Science Science (multidisciplinary) Social aspects Social networks Social participation Stakeholder Participation Stem cells Stroke Systematic review Upgrading Voters Workforce
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:	Three examples show how public participation in research can be extended at every step of the process to generate useful knowledge. Three examples show how public participation in research can be extended at every step of the process to generate useful knowledge.
ISSN:	0028-0836 1476-4687
DOI:	10.1038/d41586-018-06861-9