Reply to Brengelmann

Chou and Coyle presents their reply to the comment of doctor George L. Brengelmann on their paper regarding the change of cutaneous vascular volume reflected in the volume change after forearm venous occlusion. He interpreted that their measurement of forearm vascular volume (FVV) was calculated as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied physiology (1985) 2018-09, Vol.125 (3), p.969-969
Hauptverfasser: Chou, Ting-Heng, Coyle, Edward F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Chou and Coyle presents their reply to the comment of doctor George L. Brengelmann on their paper regarding the change of cutaneous vascular volume reflected in the volume change after forearm venous occlusion. He interpreted that their measurement of forearm vascular volume (FVV) was calculated as the increase in forearm volume during a brief period of occlusion of venous outflow from the forearm by an inflated cuff at the biceps level. And asked what assurance can they give that the increase in volume was not missed which is already present at the onset of occlusion.
ISSN:8750-7587
1522-1601
DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00595.2018