Impact of parallax and interpupillary distance on size judgment performances of virtual objects in stereoscopic displays
Effective interactions in both real and stereoscopic environments require accurate perceptions of size and position. This study investigated the effects of parallax and interpupillary distance (IPD) on size perception of virtual objects in widescreen stereoscopic environments. Twelve participants vi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ergonomics 2019-01, Vol.62 (1), p.76-87 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Effective interactions in both real and stereoscopic environments require accurate perceptions of size and position. This study investigated the effects of parallax and interpupillary distance (IPD) on size perception of virtual objects in widescreen stereoscopic environments. Twelve participants viewed virtual spherical targets displayed at seven different depth positions, based on seven parallax levels. A perceptual matching task using five circular plates of different sizes was used to report the size judgment. The results indicated that the virtual objects were perceived as larger and smaller than the corresponding theoretical sizes, respectively, in negative and positive parallaxes. Similarly, the estimates from participants with small IPDs were greater than the predicted estimates. The findings of this study are used to explain human factor issues such as the phenomenon of inaccurate depth judgments in virtual environments, where compression is widely reported, especially at farther egocentric distances. Furthermore, a multiple regression model was developed to describe how the size was affected by parallax and IPD.
Practitioner Summary: The study investigates the effects of parallax and interpupillary distance on size perception of virtual targets in a stereoscopic environment. Virtual objects were perceived as larger in negative and smaller in positive parallax. Also, size estimates were greater than the theoretical sizes for participants with smaller IPD. A multiple-regression model explains the impact of parallax and measured IPD.
Abbreviations
IPD
interpupillary distance
VR
virtual eality
HMD
head mounted-displays
2AFC
two-alternative forced choice
IOD
interocular distance
PD
pupillary distance
ANOVA
analysis of variance |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0014-0139 1366-5847 |
DOI: | 10.1080/00140139.2018.1526328 |