Perineal Stapled Rectal Prolapse Resection in Elderly Patients: Long-term Follow-up

BACKGROUND:Full-thickness rectal prolapse has a significant negative impact on quality of life. The therapeutic options, specifically in elderly patients, are imperfect. Perineal stapled rectal prolapse resection is a novel operation for treating external rectal prolapse. Long-term follow-up followi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diseases of the colon & rectum 2018-11, Vol.61 (11), p.1316-1319
Hauptverfasser: Ram, Edward, Hoffman, Aviad, Goldes, Yuri, Rosin, Danny, Horesh, Nir, Gutman, Mordechai, Edden, Yair
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND:Full-thickness rectal prolapse has a significant negative impact on quality of life. The therapeutic options, specifically in elderly patients, are imperfect. Perineal stapled rectal prolapse resection is a novel operation for treating external rectal prolapse. Long-term follow-up following this procedure is lacking. In our study, we report a long-term follow-up of 30 patients, analyzing the long-term recurrence rate, morbidity, and functional outcome. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to examine the long-term results of perineal stapled rectal resection in a population unfit for prolonged general anesthesia. DESIGN:This was a cohort study with a prospective follow-up. SETTINGS:This study was conducted at a single tertiary referral center. PATIENTS:Patients undergoing perineal stapled rectal resection from January 2010 to June 2013 were included. INTERVENTIONS:Perineal stapled rectal prolapse resection was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:The primary outcome measured was prolapse recurrence. RESULTS:A total of 30 patients underwent the surgical intervention. The median follow-up period was 61 months (range, 37–65). No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. Six patients (20%) had recurrent rectal prolapse, and continence was not achieved in any of the patients. Two patients who had recurrence underwent a redo perineal stapled rectal resection. LIMITATIONS:This study was limited by the small cohort of selected patients. CONCLUSIONS:Frail patients that can only endure a short procedure under regional anesthesia should be considered for perineal stapled rectal prolapse resection. The lack of mortality and morbidity, specifically in this population, along with the low long-term recurrence rates, make this a favorable surgical alternative. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A745.
ISSN:0012-3706
1530-0358
DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000001215