Perineal Stapled Rectal Prolapse Resection in Elderly Patients: Long-term Follow-up
BACKGROUND:Full-thickness rectal prolapse has a significant negative impact on quality of life. The therapeutic options, specifically in elderly patients, are imperfect. Perineal stapled rectal prolapse resection is a novel operation for treating external rectal prolapse. Long-term follow-up followi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diseases of the colon & rectum 2018-11, Vol.61 (11), p.1316-1319 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUND:Full-thickness rectal prolapse has a significant negative impact on quality of life. The therapeutic options, specifically in elderly patients, are imperfect. Perineal stapled rectal prolapse resection is a novel operation for treating external rectal prolapse. Long-term follow-up following this procedure is lacking. In our study, we report a long-term follow-up of 30 patients, analyzing the long-term recurrence rate, morbidity, and functional outcome.
OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to examine the long-term results of perineal stapled rectal resection in a population unfit for prolonged general anesthesia.
DESIGN:This was a cohort study with a prospective follow-up.
SETTINGS:This study was conducted at a single tertiary referral center.
PATIENTS:Patients undergoing perineal stapled rectal resection from January 2010 to June 2013 were included.
INTERVENTIONS:Perineal stapled rectal prolapse resection was performed.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:The primary outcome measured was prolapse recurrence.
RESULTS:A total of 30 patients underwent the surgical intervention. The median follow-up period was 61 months (range, 37–65). No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. Six patients (20%) had recurrent rectal prolapse, and continence was not achieved in any of the patients. Two patients who had recurrence underwent a redo perineal stapled rectal resection.
LIMITATIONS:This study was limited by the small cohort of selected patients.
CONCLUSIONS:Frail patients that can only endure a short procedure under regional anesthesia should be considered for perineal stapled rectal prolapse resection. The lack of mortality and morbidity, specifically in this population, along with the low long-term recurrence rates, make this a favorable surgical alternative. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A745. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0012-3706 1530-0358 |
DOI: | 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001215 |