Impact of shoulder deformation on volumetric modulated arc therapy doses for head and neck cancer

•Shoulder displacement creates loss of target coverage in head and neck arc therapy.•Ten patients with head and neck cancer were retrospectively analyzed.•Realistic shoulder deformation was simulated by deformation software.•Water-equivalent depth changes of >20 mm occurred with 15-mm deformation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physica medica 2018-09, Vol.53, p.118-128
Hauptverfasser: Tachibana, Hidenobu, Motegi, Kana, Moriya, Shunsuke
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Shoulder displacement creates loss of target coverage in head and neck arc therapy.•Ten patients with head and neck cancer were retrospectively analyzed.•Realistic shoulder deformation was simulated by deformation software.•Water-equivalent depth changes of >20 mm occurred with 15-mm deformations.•Deformations of >6 mm would cause large dose variations in target tissues. When using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for head and neck cancer, setup errors regarding the shoulders can create loss of target coverage or increased organ-at-risk doses. This study created variations of realistic shoulder deformations to understand the associated VMAT dosimetric effects and investigated water-equivalent thickness (WET) differences using in-house software. Ten patients with head and neck cancer with lower neck involvement were retrospectively and randomly enrolled. Their retrospective analysis comprised treatment planning using RayStation 5.0 (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden), shoulder deformation of 5–15 mm in three-dimensional axes using the ImSimQA package (Oncology Systems Limited, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, UK), and evaluation of the clinical impact of the dose distribution after recalculating the dose distribution using computed tomography images of deformed shoulders and deforming the dose distribution. Additionally, our in-house software program was used to measure WET differences for shoulder deformation. WET differences were greater in the superoinferior (SI) direction than in the other directions (the WET difference was >20 mm for 15-mm SI deformation). D99%, D98%, and D95% for all clinical target volumes were within 3%. Local dose differences of more than ±10% were found for normal tissues at the level of the shoulder for 15-mm movement in the SI direction. Shoulder deformation of >6 mm could cause large dose variations delivered to the targeted tissue at the level of the shoulder. Thus, to ensure delivery of appropriate treatment coverage to the targeted tissue, shoulder deformation should be taken into consideration during the planning stage.
ISSN:1120-1797
1724-191X
DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.08.015