Benefits and risks of unilateral and bilateral ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for axial essential tremor symptoms
Many experts assume bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) is necessary to improve axial tremor in essential tremor (ET). In the largest clinical trial of DBS for ET to date evaluating a non-directional, constant current device, we studied the effects of unilateral and staged bilateral DBS on axial...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Parkinsonism & related disorders 2019-03, Vol.60, p.126-132 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Many experts assume bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) is necessary to improve axial tremor in essential tremor (ET). In the largest clinical trial of DBS for ET to date evaluating a non-directional, constant current device, we studied the effects of unilateral and staged bilateral DBS on axial tremor.
We included all participants from the original trial with unilateral ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) DBS and 90-day follow up at minimum. Primary outcomes were changes in pooled axial subscores in the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) at 90 and 180 days after activation of unilateral VIM DBS compared to pre-operative baseline (n=119). Additionally, we performed within-subject analyses for unilateral versus bilateral DBS at 180 days in the cohort who underwent staged surgery to bilateral DBS (n=39).
Unilateral VIM DBS improved midline tremor by 58% at 90 days (median[IQR]) (3[3] to 1[2], p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1353-8020 1873-5126 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.09.004 |