Mineralization of desorption-resistant 1,4-dichlorobenzene in wetland soils

Laboratory studies were conducted to investigate the biologically mediated, aerobic mineralization of both freshly added and artificially aged, desorption‐resistant 1,4‐dichlorobenzene (1,4‐DCB). The adsorption and desorption of 1,4‐DCB isotherms were established in three wetland soils using decant–...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental toxicology and chemistry 2003-10, Vol.22 (10), p.2312-2322
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Sangjin, Pardue, John H., Moe, William M., Valsaraj, Kalliat T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Laboratory studies were conducted to investigate the biologically mediated, aerobic mineralization of both freshly added and artificially aged, desorption‐resistant 1,4‐dichlorobenzene (1,4‐DCB). The adsorption and desorption of 1,4‐DCB isotherms were established in three wetland soils using decant–refill batch techniques. Significant nonlinearity and hysteresis were observed in the isotherms with a hysteresis index ranging from 0.11 (relatively low hysteresis) in a marsh soil to 2.26 (relatively high hysteresis) in a bottomland hardwood soil from the Petro Processor (PPI) Superfund site. Mineralization of freshly added 1,4‐DCB was observed in all three soils without lag after the addition of a 1,4‐DCB degrading culture. Mineralization curves were plotted above theoretical lines predicted from a first‐order model assuming instantaneous desorption, indicating that the microbial population had access to sorbed 1,4‐DCB. In separate experiments, mineralization of artificially aged, desorption‐resistant 1,4‐DCB was also observed. Mineralization curves in these studies also indicated that the microbial population could directly access sorbed 1,4‐DCB. The extent and rate of mineralization of desorption‐resistant 1,4‐DCB decreased significantly, including rate constants decreasing from approximately 0.01 d−1 in the freshly added treatments to approximately 0.002 d−1 in the desorption‐resistant treatments. Although sorption/desorption partitioning helped explain mineralization patterns in the treatments with freshly added 1,4‐DCB, no differences were observed in mineralization curves in the desorption‐resistant treatments between soils with widely varying sorption/desorption properties.
ISSN:0730-7268
1552-8618
DOI:10.1897/02-467