A Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution with Two Attachment Systems of Varying Heights in a Mandibular Implant‐Supported Overdenture: A Three‐Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Purpose To analyze and compare the stress distribution in an implant‐retained overdenture complex using ball and Locator attachments of three heights by means of a 3D finite element analysis (FEA). Materials and Methods Six finite element models comprising an edentulous mandible with two interforami...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of prosthodontics 2019-02, Vol.28 (2), p.e795-e805
Hauptverfasser: Khurana, Nikita, Rodrigues, Shobha, Shenoy, Satish, Saldanha, Sharon, Pai, Umesh, Shetty, Thilak, N, Srikant, Mahesh, M, Hegde, Puneet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To analyze and compare the stress distribution in an implant‐retained overdenture complex using ball and Locator attachments of three heights by means of a 3D finite element analysis (FEA). Materials and Methods Six finite element models comprising an edentulous mandible with two interforaminal bone‐level implants and ball attachments of heights 1 mm (A1), 3 mm (A3), and 5 mm (A5), and Locator attachments of heights 1 mm (B1), 3 mm (B3), and 5 mm (B5), were designed using ANSYS Workbench Software. Unilateral vertical (100 N) and oblique loads (100 N at 30° to the longitudinal axis of the implant in buccolingual direction) were applied. Average von Mises stress values were evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively. Results Locator attachments showed lower stress values as compared to the ball attachments in all examined areas. The increase in the height of both resulted in increased stress values. Higher values were observed at the implant neck in all models, as compared to the body and the apex. The recorded stress was higher in the cortical bone as compared to the cancellous bone. Conclusions Within the limitations of the study, Locator attachments demonstrated lesser and more homogenous stress distribution in the implant‐overdenture complex in comparison to ball attachments. The stresses generated within the tissues increase with an increase in collar height of the attachment system and therefore, attachments should be as short as possible for more favorable stress transmission.
ISSN:1059-941X
1532-849X
DOI:10.1111/jopr.12966