Closure to "Two-Dimensional Simulation Model of Sediment Removal and Flow in Rectangular Sedimentation Basin" by Gh. Naser, B. W. Karney, and A. A. Salehi

The authors thank the discusser for his insightful comments and helpful contribution. More specifically, the discusser raises several key issues in the design of a primary rectangular sedimentation basin (PRST) that deserve added comment. Four issues in particular were highlighted: 1. How practical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2007-09, Vol.133 (9), p.945-945
Hauptverfasser: Naser, G, Karney, B W, Salehi, A A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 945
container_issue 9
container_start_page 945
container_title Journal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 133
creator Naser, G
Karney, B W
Salehi, A A
description The authors thank the discusser for his insightful comments and helpful contribution. More specifically, the discusser raises several key issues in the design of a primary rectangular sedimentation basin (PRST) that deserve added comment. Four issues in particular were highlighted: 1. How practical is the mathematical model? 2. Considering the range of the particle size used in Bechteler and Schrimpf (1985), how is the settling velocity of the particles modeled in this study? Are the model's results based on a single settling velocity (SSV) or a settling velocity curve (SVC)? 3. How significant is numerical mixing versus physical mixing? 4. How sensitive are the model's results to the turbulent Schmidt number?.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:12(1740)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21001602</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21001602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_210016023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNj91KAzEQhXOhYP15h6EXsgvdmJ-6S71r11ZB9MIteFlid2oj2USTbEtfxad1q9Jr4cAwZ74zcAhJOaOc5fwqGVflNGWFlNlIFiIRjF2nXPIbLhJeDFl6RHqH6wk5DeGdMT7MR0WPfJXGhdYjRAf9-dZlt7pBG7SzykClm9ao2C3w6Go04FZQYb0nIjxj4zYdpGwNM-O2oG3nLaOyb13IH8Df_EQFbfvwuoO7NYUnFdAPYELhhcKD8hZ3g59HY7pXpQyu9Tk5XikT8OJvnpHL2XRe3mcf3n22GOKi0WGJxiiLrg0LwbtWORPy3-A3_yNhMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21001602</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Closure to "Two-Dimensional Simulation Model of Sediment Removal and Flow in Rectangular Sedimentation Basin" by Gh. Naser, B. W. Karney, and A. A. Salehi</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Naser, G ; Karney, B W ; Salehi, A A</creator><creatorcontrib>Naser, G ; Karney, B W ; Salehi, A A</creatorcontrib><description>The authors thank the discusser for his insightful comments and helpful contribution. More specifically, the discusser raises several key issues in the design of a primary rectangular sedimentation basin (PRST) that deserve added comment. Four issues in particular were highlighted: 1. How practical is the mathematical model? 2. Considering the range of the particle size used in Bechteler and Schrimpf (1985), how is the settling velocity of the particles modeled in this study? Are the model's results based on a single settling velocity (SSV) or a settling velocity curve (SVC)? 3. How significant is numerical mixing versus physical mixing? 4. How sensitive are the model's results to the turbulent Schmidt number?.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:12(1740)</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2007-09, Vol.133 (9), p.945-945</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Naser, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karney, B W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salehi, A A</creatorcontrib><title>Closure to "Two-Dimensional Simulation Model of Sediment Removal and Flow in Rectangular Sedimentation Basin" by Gh. Naser, B. W. Karney, and A. A. Salehi</title><title>Journal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>The authors thank the discusser for his insightful comments and helpful contribution. More specifically, the discusser raises several key issues in the design of a primary rectangular sedimentation basin (PRST) that deserve added comment. Four issues in particular were highlighted: 1. How practical is the mathematical model? 2. Considering the range of the particle size used in Bechteler and Schrimpf (1985), how is the settling velocity of the particles modeled in this study? Are the model's results based on a single settling velocity (SSV) or a settling velocity curve (SVC)? 3. How significant is numerical mixing versus physical mixing? 4. How sensitive are the model's results to the turbulent Schmidt number?.</description><issn>0733-9372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNj91KAzEQhXOhYP15h6EXsgvdmJ-6S71r11ZB9MIteFlid2oj2USTbEtfxad1q9Jr4cAwZ74zcAhJOaOc5fwqGVflNGWFlNlIFiIRjF2nXPIbLhJeDFl6RHqH6wk5DeGdMT7MR0WPfJXGhdYjRAf9-dZlt7pBG7SzykClm9ao2C3w6Go04FZQYb0nIjxj4zYdpGwNM-O2oG3nLaOyb13IH8Df_EQFbfvwuoO7NYUnFdAPYELhhcKD8hZ3g59HY7pXpQyu9Tk5XikT8OJvnpHL2XRe3mcf3n22GOKi0WGJxiiLrg0LwbtWORPy3-A3_yNhMg</recordid><startdate>20070901</startdate><enddate>20070901</enddate><creator>Naser, G</creator><creator>Karney, B W</creator><creator>Salehi, A A</creator><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070901</creationdate><title>Closure to "Two-Dimensional Simulation Model of Sediment Removal and Flow in Rectangular Sedimentation Basin" by Gh. Naser, B. W. Karney, and A. A. Salehi</title><author>Naser, G ; Karney, B W ; Salehi, A A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_210016023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Naser, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karney, B W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salehi, A A</creatorcontrib><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Naser, G</au><au>Karney, B W</au><au>Salehi, A A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Closure to "Two-Dimensional Simulation Model of Sediment Removal and Flow in Rectangular Sedimentation Basin" by Gh. Naser, B. W. Karney, and A. A. Salehi</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2007-09-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>945</spage><epage>945</epage><pages>945-945</pages><issn>0733-9372</issn><abstract>The authors thank the discusser for his insightful comments and helpful contribution. More specifically, the discusser raises several key issues in the design of a primary rectangular sedimentation basin (PRST) that deserve added comment. Four issues in particular were highlighted: 1. How practical is the mathematical model? 2. Considering the range of the particle size used in Bechteler and Schrimpf (1985), how is the settling velocity of the particles modeled in this study? Are the model's results based on a single settling velocity (SSV) or a settling velocity curve (SVC)? 3. How significant is numerical mixing versus physical mixing? 4. How sensitive are the model's results to the turbulent Schmidt number?.</abstract><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:12(1740)</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-9372
ispartof Journal of environmental engineering (New York, N.Y.), 2007-09, Vol.133 (9), p.945-945
issn 0733-9372
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21001602
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
title Closure to "Two-Dimensional Simulation Model of Sediment Removal and Flow in Rectangular Sedimentation Basin" by Gh. Naser, B. W. Karney, and A. A. Salehi
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T15%3A38%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Closure%20to%20%22Two-Dimensional%20Simulation%20Model%20of%20Sediment%20Removal%20and%20Flow%20in%20Rectangular%20Sedimentation%20Basin%22%20by%20Gh.%20Naser,%20B.%20W.%20Karney,%20and%20A.%20A.%20Salehi&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20engineering%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Naser,%20G&rft.date=2007-09-01&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=945&rft.epage=945&rft.pages=945-945&rft.issn=0733-9372&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:12(1740)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E21001602%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21001602&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true