Decompressive hemicraniectomy without clot evacuation in supratentorial deep-seated intracerebral hemorrhage

•Decompressive craniectomy without clot evacuation lowers intracranial pressure.•good outcome for patients with hematoma evacuation was slightly higher.•two groups in terms of mortality at 6 months were similar.•two groups in terms of GOS at 6 months were similar. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) lowe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical neurology and neurosurgery 2018-11, Vol.174, p.1-6
Hauptverfasser: Rasras, S., Safari, H., Zeinali, M., Jahangiri, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Decompressive craniectomy without clot evacuation lowers intracranial pressure.•good outcome for patients with hematoma evacuation was slightly higher.•two groups in terms of mortality at 6 months were similar.•two groups in terms of GOS at 6 months were similar. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) lowers intracranial pressure and improves outcomes in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery stroke; yet, its usefulness in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is unclear. The authors sought to assess the preliminary utility of decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) without clot evacuation in patients with deep-seated supratentorial ICH. Patients with deep seated spontaneous ICH who were admitted to the Golestan Hospital, of Ahvaz, from November 2014 to February 2016, were prospectively enrolled in this study. A prospective clinical trial where 30 patients diagnosed having large hypertensive ICH was randomly allocated to either group A or B using permuted-block randomization. These patients (n = 30), who all had large deep seated supratentorial ICH with surgery indications, were randomly divided to two groups. ultimately, in one group (n = 13), large DHC was performed without clot evacuation, while in the other (n = 17), craniotomy with clot evacuation was done. Data pertaining to the patients' characteristics and treatment outcomes were prospectively collected. There was no statistically significant difference between two treatment groups (P > 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of mortality and GOS at 6 months (P > 0.05); nevertheless, the good outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale = 4–5) for patients with hematoma evacuation was slightly higher (35.3%) as compared to the DHC patients without clot evacuation (30.7%). Decompresive craniectomy without clot evacuation in deep seated ICH can be accomplished with identical mortality and outcome in comparison to patient that undergone clot evacuation.
ISSN:0303-8467
1872-6968
DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.08.017