Individual Differences in Uncertainty Tolerance Are not Associated With Cognitive Control Functions in the Flanker Task
Cognitive control refers to the ability to make correct decisions concurrent to distracting information, and to adapt to conflicting stimulus configurations, eventually promoting goal-directed behavior. Previous research has linked individual differences in cognitive control to psychopathological co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental psychology 2018-07, Vol.65 (4), p.245-256 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Cognitive control refers to the ability to make correct
decisions concurrent to distracting information, and to adapt to conflicting
stimulus configurations, eventually promoting goal-directed behavior. Previous
research has linked individual differences in cognitive control to
psychopathological conditions such as anxiety. However, a link with uncertainty
tolerance (UT) has not been tested so far, although both constructs describe
cognitive and behavioral performance in ambiguous situations, thus they share
some similarities. We probed cognitive control in web-based experimentation
(jsPsych) with a simple flanker task (N = 111)
and a version without confounds in episodic memory
(N = 116). Both experiments revealed two
well-established behavioral indices: congruency effects (CEs) and
congruency-sequence effects (CSEs). Only small-to-zero correlations emerged
between CEs, UT, and need for cognitive closure (NCC), a personality trait
inversely related to UT. A subtle correlation
(r = .18) was noted in Experiment 2 between NCC
and CSE. Throughout, Bayesian analyses provided anecdotal-to-moderate evidence
for the null-hypotheses. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1618-3169 2190-5142 |
DOI: | 10.1027/1618-3169/a000408 |