A method to measure Kr/N sub(2) ratios in air bubbles trapped in ice cores and its application in reconstructing past mean ocean temperature

We describe a new method for precise measurement of Kr/N sub(2) ratios in air bubbles trapped in ice cores and the first reconstruction of atmospheric Kr/N sub(2) during the last glacial maximum (LGM) 620,000 years ago. After gravitational correction, the Kr/N sub(2) record in ice cores should repre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2007-11, Vol.112 (D19)
Hauptverfasser: Headly, Melissa A, Severinghaus, Jeffrey P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We describe a new method for precise measurement of Kr/N sub(2) ratios in air bubbles trapped in ice cores and the first reconstruction of atmospheric Kr/N sub(2) during the last glacial maximum (LGM) 620,000 years ago. After gravitational correction, the Kr/N sub(2) record in ice cores should represent the atmospheric ratio, which in turn should reflect past ocean temperature change due to the dependence of gas solubility on temperature. The increase in krypton inventory in the glacial ocean due to higher gas solubility in colder water causes a decrease in the atmospheric inventory of krypton. Assuming Kr and N sub(2) inventories in the ocean-atmosphere system are conserved, we use a mass balance model to estimate a mean ocean temperature change between the LGM and today. We measured Kr/N sub(2) in air bubbles in Greenland (GISP2) ice from the late Holocene and LGM, using the present atmosphere as a standard. The late Holocene dKr/N sub(2) means from two sets of measurements are not different from zero (+0.07 plus or minus 0.30ppt and - 0.14 plus or minus 0.93ppt), as expected from the relatively constant climate of the last millennium. The mean dKr/N sub(2) in air bubbles from the LGM is -1.34 plus or minus 0.37ppt. Using the mass balance model, we estimate that the mean temperature change between the LGM ocean and todays ocean was 2.7 plus or minus 0.6. Although this error is large compared to the observed change, this finding is consistent with most previous estimates of LGM deep ocean temperature based on foraminiferal d super(18)O and sediment pore water d super(18)O and chlorinity.
ISSN:2169-897X
2169-8996
DOI:10.1029/2006JD008317