Ionisation efficiencies can be predicted in complicated biological matrices: A proof of concept

The importance of metabolites is assessed based on their abundance. Most of the metabolites are at present identified based on ESI/MS measurements and the relative abundance is assessed from the relative peak areas of these metabolites. Unfortunately, relative intensities can be highly misleading as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analytica chimica acta 2018-11, Vol.1032, p.68-74
Hauptverfasser: Liigand, Piia, Liigand, Jaanus, Cuyckens, Filip, Vreeken, Rob J., Kruve, Anneli
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The importance of metabolites is assessed based on their abundance. Most of the metabolites are at present identified based on ESI/MS measurements and the relative abundance is assessed from the relative peak areas of these metabolites. Unfortunately, relative intensities can be highly misleading as different compounds ionise with vastly different efficiency in the ESI source and matrix components may cause severe ionisation suppression. In order to reduce this inaccuracy, we propose predicting the ionisation efficiencies of the analytes in seven biological matrices (neat solvent, blood, plasma, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, brain and liver tissue homogenates). We demonstrate, that this approach may lead to an order of magnitude increase in accuracy even in complicated matrices. For the analyses of 10 compounds, mostly drugs, in negative electrospray ionisation mode we reduce the predicted abundance mismatch compared to the actual abundance on average from 660 to 8 times. The ionisation efficiencies were predicted based on i) the charge delocalisation parameter WAPS and ii) the degree of ionisation α, and the prediction model was subsequently validated based on the cross-validation method ‘leave-one-out’. [Display omitted] •10 compounds were analysed in neat solvent, blood, plasma, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, brain and liver tissue homogenates.•Assuming equal ionisation efficiencies lead to mismatch of 660 times between actual and predicted ESI/MS responses.•Ionisation efficiencies were predicted via charged delocalisation and degree of ionisation.•Ionisation efficiencies allowed reducing prediction mismatch to 8 times.
ISSN:0003-2670
1873-4324
DOI:10.1016/j.aca.2018.05.072